I respect her choice. She has a nice figure, so obviously, she has quite a bit of discipline and self-control over her habits.
Besides, "physical fitness" (as now defined) for women is only a very modern and urban American concept. ie) traditional womanhood never recognized that a woman had to be "buff." I had an old aunt who in her time, looked, and dressed, like Grace Kelly. She wore gloves and a pillbox hat to ride the subway in NY City in the early 1950s. For her "exercise" was a walk through Central Park. Totally the opposite of a modern shrieking feminist who thinks they need to be equals of men in boorish behavior and muscles.
They looked fine but there was a lack of vibrancy that you see in, for example, the women from New England who one also frequently sees in New York. The New England women are recognizable by their preppy clothes and glowing "sans makeup" skin.
The New England women were generally a little more full-bodied but looked like they could hike a mountain or swim across a lake.
The strictly NYC women looked too porcelain (for me at least).
Kat Timpf needs to take up hiking and/or cross country skiing. She needs some roses in her cheeks.
Just my humble unabashedly chauvinistic opinion.;-)
And let’s not forget about all these female sportscasters who are foisted on us whether we like it or not, who sound like they’re trying to imitate the rowdiest drunken shirtless male face painter at a sub zero degree Green Bay Packers game.
On the other hand, as a Brooklyn Nets fan, I do happen to like the woman announcer on the Nets cable channel ( same network as Yankees), Sara Kustok. She dresses and acts feminine, and doesn’t sound like she’s trying too hard... Seems genuinely knowledgeable about the game.