Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: yesthatjallen
"If" is the key word here. Iffa', coulda', woulda', shoulda' but there's no evidence of it but that lying Cohen.

Their "proof" is Cohen's testimony, which has become clear he is lying to save his own arse.

As Comey has said about Hillary's many crimes and violations of statues, "There was no intent to violate the law."

Therefore, "Our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case [against Hillary]," he concluded.

What's good for the goose, is good for the gander.

49 posted on 01/18/2019 7:03:43 AM PST by HotHunt (Reagan was good but TRUMP IS GREAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HotHunt

The question is whether there’s other proof besides Cohen’s word. Don’t forget that Cohen had been taping all his phone calls with Trump and that all that info was seized with legally approved warrants.

I don’t know if “buzzfeed” (sheesh) is right or not, but if they are, it’s more than just Cohen’s word against Trump’s.

At least Trump didn’t have sex with an intern, but he may have suborned perjury to obstruct justice.


77 posted on 01/18/2019 7:31:13 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson