Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I wonder if this system is scalable. For example, if a 5 inch HVP can fly at Mach 3 with a range of 40 miles what would say an 8 inch version or higher be able to do. What is the capabilities of a 16 inch battleship firing 16 inch versions of these rounds.
1 posted on 01/09/2019 9:39:43 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

None. The Iowa class is in mothballs or on display. They won’t be coming back.


2 posted on 01/09/2019 9:43:20 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
The U.S. Navy Quietly Tested Mach 3 Heavy Gun Shells

I doubt it was quiet when they were testing...

3 posted on 01/09/2019 9:44:21 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

any idea of the barrel twist?


5 posted on 01/09/2019 9:50:17 AM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

What the Navy really needs are rapid firing 5” “shotgun” shells to send a hail of steel to engage incoming missiles as a last line of defense.


6 posted on 01/09/2019 9:50:19 AM PST by allendale (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Headline writer has odd idea of what constitutes a naval heavy gun.

18,16,15,14,12.

Maybe even 8.

But not 5


7 posted on 01/09/2019 9:51:19 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
The U.S. Navy Quietly Tested Mach 3 Heavy Gun Shells That Could Revolutionize Surface Warfare

These will be a partial defense to high Mach number missiles, but probably not to sub-orbital ballistic warheads.

Bottom line, carrier groups, capital ships and sometimes even submarines will face a growing risk of not surviving an engagement.

What is the capabilities of a 16 inch battleship firing 16 inch versions of these rounds.

Gerald Bull could have told us that 20 years ago, if the US had been smart enough to keep him on the DOD payroll.

9 posted on 01/09/2019 9:55:33 AM PST by Navy Patriot (America NEEDS Mob Rule, another European and Mid East World War and a universal Draft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Both up and down...

When does this come to the infantry man’s gun ?!?


10 posted on 01/09/2019 9:59:43 AM PST by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

https://news.usni.org/2015/06/01/navy-researching-firing-mach-5-guided-round-from-standard-deck-guns

Testing has been going on for years.

The 5” has to be modified to accept the round.

Yet another Navy program that’ll take decades to implement if ever.


14 posted on 01/09/2019 10:18:29 AM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

The U.S. Navy Quietly Tested Mach 3 Heavy Gun Shells That Could Revolutionize Surface Warfare .................................. An exact copy should appear on the Chinese navy ships shortly.


16 posted on 01/09/2019 10:30:28 AM PST by Bringbackthedraft (What is earned is treasured, what is free is worth what you paid for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan; LonePalm

Ping. Thinking of you.
#NoHomo


20 posted on 01/09/2019 10:56:00 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Build the Montana class.


21 posted on 01/09/2019 10:57:39 AM PST by Jim Noble (Freedom is the freedom to say that 2+2 = 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
The Army was shooting tank main gun rounds in the mid-70s that had a muzzle velocity in excess of Mach 4. Now they're closer to Mach 5 (4.8+).

What took the Navy so long?

29 posted on 01/09/2019 11:35:57 AM PST by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
Mach 3 is about 2300 miles per hour (Mach 1 is the speed of sound, which is about 760 mph at sea level). 2300 mph is about 3300 feet per second.

The normal muzzle velocity of naval guns during World War Two was about 2600 feet per second. The German 88mm gun used by the Tiger II tank in 1944-45 had a muzzle velocity of about 3300 feet per second.

I.e., big *ucking deal. Yawn. The major advantage of a rail gun with a Mach 3 muzzle velocity is that it doesn't need a propellant charge. Instead it requires less combustible liquid fuel to generate electricity, and might (only "might") be able to fire more rounds per minute.

31 posted on 01/09/2019 11:49:58 AM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
God help us, yet another hysterical Poular Mechanix article.

You know, those guys that claim we have operational ship reail guns, etc?

The navy was developing ERGM decades ago for the 5" guns, a rocket boosted GPS guided extended range munition. They dropped that program at some point.

33 posted on 01/09/2019 12:05:57 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
PM article pretty much lifted from the drive - the war zone
U.S. Navy Destroyer Fired Off Advanced Hyper Velocity Projectiles During 2018 Exercise

The new rounds dramatically expand the ability of the guns on these ships and other platforms to engage surface targets and air and missile threats.
By Joseph TrevithickJanuary 8, 2019

34 posted on 01/09/2019 12:14:57 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

The Russians have been loudly broadcasting their work in this area but this leads me to believe once again we are far ahead of them and their talk is mostly just that. Well done Squids! (Retired Army Officer)


35 posted on 01/09/2019 12:21:38 PM PST by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

47 posted on 01/09/2019 5:43:48 PM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson