Agree. Women may be upset, but they can’t be upset with the practical application of Sexual Marketplace Value.
The President of France may think a mommy figure attractive, but for most men 25 beats 50, particularly if they desire to start a family. Female reproductive biology rules and is not subject to political correctness, imo.
>>Agree. Women may be upset, but they can’t be upset with the practical application of Sexual Marketplace Value.<<
So true.
Men in their late 30s, early 40s are a HUGE catch for women of the same cohort.
In today’s society, women in their prime sexual marketplace value (hot in their 20s/early 30s) give their wares away. Nature gave them this to provide an incentive to procreate.
Later, when their attractiveness lowers and men instinctively shy away (men want to procreate until they die even if the act does not result on procreation), female biology takes over and the “why are the good men taken” syndrome kicks in.
They may mock God but they cannot mock nature.
This guy might not be a catch by how he looks but he is a catch by what he offers.
Women in their late 30s and early 40s have 2 choices: him or being the neighborhood cat lady.
Again, this is ACROSS THE COHORT. There are red hot women in their 50s (my wife — in her early 60s who looks 30s-ish). There are guys who could not land a woman in her 70s.
But as a numbers game, he is 100% correct.
SMV is hate speech—and that is why the first rule of fight club is that you don’t talk about fight club. ;-)