Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick

I don’t see “the other hand” as your example is one of inference, depending on ones state of mind, where the vulgarity I refer to is blatant and leaves nothing to infer.

But I agree there was a lot of sexual innuendo used that I didn’t understand as a youngster. Today’s youngsters are much better versed in everything sexual.


53 posted on 01/08/2019 5:06:06 AM PST by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: sonofagun

Yes, you’re right, it’s not really comparable. I really meant that colloquialisms and slang phrases often have more sexual referents than we might realize. That’s different from being graphically obvious, though.

Between the lost prurience of “in like Flynn” and the in-your-face ick of “hot AF,” there are usages such as praising a person by saying that he (or she) “has a pair.” Get a dictionary, people. We have pages of excellent words that clearly describe the qualities you can’t bother to specify!


61 posted on 01/08/2019 5:30:06 AM PST by Tax-chick (What can I do to fight entropy today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson