Posted on 01/07/2019 10:54:23 PM PST by ransomnote
I did check yesterday with my source in Gitmo.
I asked: “Anything new? Any new arrivals?”
Answer: “Nope. Groundhog day.”
We DO want the same thing: Cankles and Zero behind bars.
Amen. And eventually, one way or the other, either Q will be correct or not.
There’s a nuclear option McConnell can do, can’t remember what it is. But he better do it.
Can’t read it, blocked.
Clutching a Bible is very different from regular Bible studies, not to belabor a point...
“I remember seeing Bill and Hill coming out of a real church clutching a Bible.”
Bill always waved around a great big Bible for all to see. But Hillary chose the church if I remember right and I doubt they ever cracked open that big old Bible. Too bad they didn’t.
Polar opposites. Unitarian is hurray for everything. Quaker is hurray for nothing. :D
They’re both centers of hardcore commiepukedom.
I had to disable my ad blocker to read it.
I am also taking the browser Vivaldi for a test drive and I am using “uBlock Origin” as the ad blocker.
For what ever reason, the article wasn’t blocked but the ad blocker did work.
There’s a nuclear option McConnell can do, can’t remember what it is. But he better do it.
**************************************************************************
Nuclear Option: Change the rules so that it only takes a majority. Turtle should have done this in order to pass the house bill containing funding for the Wall in 2018. DJT tweeted about it then.
Turtle didn’t want to. Harry Reid did it for election of Supreme Court Nominees, but Turtle didn’t want to do it for this.
Maybe they were ‘bolt guns’ such as used in the detective novel Bolt and the gas powered variety as shown in the movie No Country for Old Men. Those are very efficient for abattoir operations.
It is confusing since on the one hand you have US marshals, but then when the government cracks down it’s called martial. They both relate to Mars, they both relate to war. The Romans muster point was called the Field of Mars.
Sorry #nogrammarnazi
Of course. Sorry. Mrs Livingston forgives you but you still get a “D” on your paper.
Lol, no problem. I'm glad when someone cares enough to take their time to correct me.
My plate is usually full just trying to accurately convey what I'm trying to say. :D
Here I actually know the differences, just to lazy, or in too big of a hurry to recheck what I had written.
I appreciate and thank you for the kind followup and edification!
From a military perspective at least, you're correct. An obstacle, whether anti-tank ditches and obstacles, a wall, minefield, etc is useless unless under observation by those who put it in place. A mobile rapid deployment force can then be activated when needed and cover a large area.
Rita said: “I believe no Wall of any type can be erected, but then abandoned and left unmanned.”
compuguru replied:
“ From a military perspective at least, you’re correct. An obstacle, whether anti-tank ditches and obstacles, a wall, minefield, etc is useless unless under observation by those who put it in place. A mobile rapid deployment force can then be activated when needed and cover a large area.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks *compuguru. All things are being tested constantly, endlessly challenged and advanced. Politically and really, including The Wall. The same as in any theater of war, the Border of the USA is a great Prize to her friends and Enemies and must to be kept in cutting edge shape.
We are in a new era, where war appears as Peace, and in the appearance of Peace, we are damned sure At war.
Build The Wall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.