Ninth Circuit Court Rules Border Wall Must Be 'Short Enough That A Pregnant Woman Carrying A Child In Each Arm Could Be Expected To Scale It Without Difficulty'
1 posted on
12/18/2018 10:16:54 PM PST by
bitt
To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...
2 posted on
12/18/2018 10:17:12 PM PST by
bitt
(,)
To: bitt
3 posted on
12/18/2018 10:20:53 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will.")
To: bitt
Ninth Circuit can suck a bag of cocks. I know the article is satire, but I stand behind my comment.
4 posted on
12/18/2018 10:30:24 PM PST by
dinodino
To: bitt
Would be hilarious if not true.
5 posted on
12/18/2018 10:30:45 PM PST by
A strike
(Import Third World become Third World)
To: bitt
9th circuit, if we don’t knock the hell out of it with Trump, no one will.
Let’s get to knocking!
7 posted on
12/18/2018 11:10:21 PM PST by
pacificus
To: bitt
9 posted on
12/19/2018 1:51:32 AM PST by
gattaca
("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
To: bitt
Satire. But close to the truth.
I think the wall could easily be built with existing materials. Sections of drilling pipe or railroad track could be rammed into the earth every 3 inches, with a 12 inch steel pipe topper. Mount sensors to detect intruders underground or climbing over.
11 posted on
12/19/2018 8:35:05 AM PST by
lurk
To: bitt
The problem with anchor babies is this. Our laws provide that a citizen sponsor is necessary to allow immigration to citizenship to ensue. That sponsor is responsible for the welfare of the applicant until the applicant is self-sustaining.
In the case of anchor babies, the ‘applicant’ is the parent, and the ‘sponsor’ is the baby. This is the liberal nonsense inspired by their globalist enablers pushed in my local paper.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson