Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JockoManning

Jocko, we’ve been doing well until our thread fully engaged disruptors, which is true of any regular thread on the forum.
If too many have too much of an allergy for the religion forum—why not merely a “philosophical caucus” or “social caucus” thread—maybe in a larger, more general TRUMP Forum or Chat or whatever such.
__________________________
Moving to a “no debate” thread would kill our friendly debates about theories and data that we use to refine our thinking and build our knowledge base. There’s no way to define a line clearly enough so that friendly debates could be separated from disruption debates.

We’ve grown through our struggles and realize that we are better off not engaging those who arrive to provoke. We’ve got this.


966 posted on 12/16/2018 5:00:33 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 955 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

That would work for me—IF—the vast majority of the family would be self-disciplined, self-controlled enough to firmly support it. Personally, I’d still like to see you the mod over the Q forum.


967 posted on 12/16/2018 5:03:14 PM PST by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 966 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson