Q Anon: 12/14/18 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 12/14/18 | FReepers, vanity

[greeneyes]

How about Trump’s tweets today
**************************************************************************
Thank You for posting. Finally something worth reading! What a slog fest this has been till now.

[grey_whiskers]

+1, oh first-born.

[little jeremiah]

I can only post pictures because kindly people gave me lots of instructions.

Kek....

[Trump_the_Evil_Left]

NO, I think FR has always been a pretty awesome site. I have tried to ignore most of the flame wars over the years and have simply found many pockets of good conservatives to discuss articles, issues, events. I am not much affected by any of the waves of passion because (before this Q business) I was pretty careful to avoid the flame wars entirely.

[xone]

gisd O

[Enigo54]

I should never have the ability to post pictures, way to much power over the NPC’s!

[Mears]

Bagster’s banned.

.

[Trump_the_Evil_Left]

I am trying to get people to THINK.

That is not done much around here, despite all the exhortations from “Q”.... reasoning, evidence, logic, etc. are in short supply on Q threads, as evidenced by all the pointless abuse that I and several others have been barraged with here today.

[grey_whiskers]

He’s still way, *way* ahead of you.

[Enigo54]

Agreed

[little jeremiah]

That is VERY interesting. Thanks for the additional.

[Enigo54]

Yes, we should all think like an NPC, who does not even know what that means. The ONE place we all can come to exchange thoughts, should be changed just so that you find it a proper place.

Enjoy Germany much?

[Wneighbor]

So, how many of us use icicles? Or do you use tinsel? Or, do you call the icicles “tinsel”?

***********

Hi Miss Blu. I love icicles myself. They've been my favorite part of the tree since I was a kid.

Had an hour to check out the thread tonight and this is the best post I've found with so much scrolling trolls.

Congrats on that yuge tree! I know it's gorgeous!

[grey_whiskers]

See, *that* wasn’t so difficult, was it? And now you and Disestablishmentarian have the beginnings of a *dialogue*.

[dforest]

I don’t post on this thread much.....but it seems you need to go away and just leave people alone. They got your point, so join another thread,

Sick of you people agitating for no good reason. You don’t like Q stuff? Fine, then go away.

[little jeremiah]

Compared to all the crap flung on this thread it’s odd he would be banned and all the crap flingers are just fine and dandy.

[going hot]

Wrong person got zapped.

This type of selective enforcement will continue until there is an en masse protest.

I for one, will not accept this shit, no more posts, no more replies, and certainly no more donations.

[eldoradude]

Interesting read from CTH -

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/12/15/oh-my-doj-inadvertently-highlights-ssci-corruption-in-responsive-filing-toward-wolfe-sentencing-memo/#more-157787

Oh My – DOJ Inadvertently Highlights SSCI Corruption in Responsive Filing Toward Wolfe Sentencing Memo…

Posted on December 15, 2018 by sundance

Well, well, well. This is likely to be quickly brushed under the proverbial rug. If you have followed the case against SSCI Security Director James Wolfe you will note the original indictment against him outlined, obliquely, how Wolfe took custody of the Carter Page FISA application and then leaked it to his concubine at Buzzfeed Ms. Ali Watkins.

Well, yesterday the DOJ filed a response to the Wolfe defense teams’ own sentencing memo (full pdf below), and within the DOJ response they, perhaps inadvertently, posted an exhibit (#13) written by the FBI special agent in charge, which specifically says:

….”because of the known disclosure of classified information, the FISA application”…

(Full DOJ response link - https://www.scribd.com/document/395775597/Wolfe-Case-DOJ-Response-to-Defense-Sentencing-Memo)

Footnote to DOJ sentencing memo -

“The government has reviewed the letters of support written for the defendant, including those written by the SSCI and former members of the USIC. The letters share a certain common theme, which is perhaps best summarized as follows: the defendant appeared steadfast and honest in my multiple dealings, and I believe he kept secrets to which I was privy. What is missing from any of these letters, however, is a person who says they knew the double life that Wolfe was leading, and that they were aware he was sharing information from the SSCI with multiple national security reporters over multiple years.”

Verrry interesting - Derp State wriggling vigorously on the hook.

[Publius]

It’s not odd. He personally threatened to zot someone, which is the exclusive province of the Mods. That’s why he was zotted. It’s unfortunate, but he was warned.

[stars & stripes forever]

Today’s Q Anon has been inundated non-stop A.M. - P.M. with 3 disrupters who were trying to pick a fight. Q posters tried to be reasonable with them, then opted to post troll memes -anything to encourage their exit Please review the today’s thread, identify them, and ban them from this thread.

Those who frequent the Q site on a regular basis enjoy discussing and analyzing public policy. We also enjoy Bagster. He was merely defending his “territory”. We welcome everyone to discuss issues, but today intruders were over the top.

I disagree with your decision concerning Bagster.