Q Anon: 12/14/18 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 12/14/18 | FReepers, vanity

[bagster]

Again, with all due respect, and forgive me if I'm too big for my britches, but I have a possible solution.

I hear tell that the position of administrative moderator is a voluntary position and that the "mods" run their own program.

What if were assigned as one. You must have observed, during your studies of what really goes on this thread, that she is fair-minded, judicious, patient, and restrained. She knows how to handle perceived authority and doesn't allow it to go to her head. She wouldn't abuse the position or the "power".

If she were willing, and I don't know that she is, you and your team should consider granting her the position.

I see it as a win/win. No more headaches for you. No more headaches for us.

Whaddya think, admin mod?

p.s. I'm only addressing this to you cause you appear to want dialogue.

Thank you for listening.

😃

Bagster

[JockoManning]

Certainly you could be quite right.

However, historically, when admin has thrown something to FREEPERS for a response, they were quite willing to have at least a moderately robust dialogue about what they threw out to the troops--for at least a few pages.

I think a failure to respond cooperatively to the mod's query would be MORE rude.

[bagster]

I suspect the Mods have heard enough from this thread for the day. Just a guess....

Ooooopsie.

Bagster

[JockoManning]

I think you were talking about ransomnote but you left her name out of that sentence.

I think that would be an excellent solution.

[bagster]

What if were assigned as one.

Apologies. I meant to say, "What if ransomnote were assigned as one".

Sorry.

Bagster

[ransomnote]

Jocko, we’ve been doing well until our thread fully engaged disruptors, which is true of any regular thread on the forum.
If too many have too much of an allergy for the religion forum—why not merely a “philosophical caucus” or “social caucus” thread—maybe in a larger, more general TRUMP Forum or Chat or whatever such.
__________________________
Moving to a “no debate” thread would kill our friendly debates about theories and data that we use to refine our thinking and build our knowledge base. There’s no way to define a line clearly enough so that friendly debates could be separated from disruption debates.

We’ve grown through our struggles and realize that we are better off not engaging those who arrive to provoke. We’ve got this.

[JockoManning]

That would work for me—IF—the vast majority of the family would be self-disciplined, self-controlled enough to firmly support it. Personally, I’d still like to see you the mod over the Q forum.

[bagster]

the vast majority of the family

Now that's cult talk right there.

#CharlesManson

#HelterSkelter

#NotHelpful

#WhyIsItSoQuietAllOfASudden

😏

Bagster

[JockoManning]

No. Cult talk would be trying to get all your prospective wives in one room with no hair pulling or face scratching! LOL.

[JockoManning]

I wish the family had provided the admin mod more of a robust discussion. Oh well. We tried.

Hopefully, Ransomnote is right--it's settled enough.

[bagster]

I see you got sprung!

Yes, ma'am I did.

(with your kind assistance, I think)

😉

Bagster

[buffaloguy]

Skipping posts is normal. Don’t let it bother you.

[WASCWatch]

The list of people Huber has interviewed is extremely short. On top of that he lost 6,000 pages of documents sent by the private investigators twice, and had to ask them to be resent when Huber learned they’d be testifying at a Confessional hearing.

Huber is doing nothing.

[Trump_the_Evil_Left]

aahhhh yes, "The Family"..... I knew you guys reminded me of something ......you just need more LSD.... ;^)

THE FAMILY

[bagster]