Posted on 12/14/2018 10:00:25 PM PST by ransomnote
Would you like to provide an answer? Here and now?
Pass.
See, it just doesn’t matter with these people.
“evaluation of issues” has never implied or guaranteed an extensive investigation.... in another statement Sessions (now long gone) said that Huber would “review” some of these “matters” and “advise” him. Does that sound like a guarantee of a deep and thorough investigation? No, Sessions was merely putting off Congressional calls for a 2nd special counsel by saying he would ask Huber’s advice and Huber would consult with the Inspector General (Horowitz).
Now I am not as pessimistic as some, I think it is ***possible*** that much more is going on behind the scenes than the public (or Congress) has any idea of. But hope and possibility are not certainty and guarantee and actual investigative results or PROSECUTIONS.
The FreeQs take every hint and every glimmer of something and turn it into a raging certitude about vast machinations and historic projects. Is it ***possible*** that Huber and/or Horowitz will come out with some crushing report or investigation leading to prosecutions that will be a game-changer?
Sure, lots of things are possible, but so far there is not much EVIDENCE or REASON to believe it (unless you believe everything coming from a secretive anonymous internet oracle who fakes his “insider” status and has been wrong about so many things in the past).
So far, we have’t even seen McCabe or Strzok facing charges!!! Never mind Comey, etc. So what are the real chances that Clintons and their cronies will be facing charges? Pretty modest chance, I say, but I am not without plenty of HOPE.
I never read the idiots’ comments. Only by accident a bit as I scroll down, since I’m a fast reader.
They are dead to me.
perhaps if there weren't "Rule number one, and the most important rule of them all: Never, EVER defend. ALWAYS attack. He who defends has already lost. Make the troll defend." you'de get a better response. Look at rule one and ask yourself if that is not provocation as well. A discussion is a two-way street. A long time ago there were attempts at discussion. Some would have none of that. Look in the mirror.
McNoName’s foundation that IIRC his wife ran (or still does) was all about “helping the children” and for years they were “in communication” with Backdoor but never did anything.
Trump of course shut Backdoor down very quickly.
Paid disrupters.
Especially the guy with the super-lame and obviously bogus cover story, "Oh for years and years I was a lurker who never posted but then I lost my password and came back and now I can't shut up on this thread" is proof.
Can I put you down for January 20th, 2021 or January 20th 2025 (fingers crossed)?
Pretending it doesn’t know what “a” Share Blue is.
Real people know what SB is.
The specific wording of Hubers assignment did not include investigating anything or anyone. It was to do an internal review of resources for ongoing investigations. Nothing more. Only the q people have managed to misinterpret this to mean investigating everything that anyone has complained about.
Okay, then.
That is the ***entire point*** of the Q threads.
Your problem is that you lack basic reading comprehension and lack all knowledge of the US federal govt.
“evaluate certain issues” is a far cry from guaranteeing any extensive investigations pulling out all the stops.
“evaluate certain issues” can mean as little as “here, Mr. Huber, read these few memos and tell me if you think I need to do anything” signed, Jeff Sessions
P.s. Mr. Huber, better hurry and get back to me before I am fired....
p.p.s. Sorry, Mr. Huber, I have been fired and am no longer the US Attorney General. Hope you had fun!
Merry Christmas and bttt!
Good News! You Tube is playing games as well.
No, the Q threads continually claim far far more. There are constant claims of all kinds of vast insider knowledge being leaked out in pieces by a vague inept internet Oracle.
I have said from the beginning (the first weeks of “Q”) that all issues and evidence should be investigated as thoroughly as possible, but that no reliance should be placed on “Q says” as a form of evidence or certitude.
i.e., it was obvious to anyone who knew much about these subjects that “Q” was not some top-secret insider in military intel, DoD, White House, etc.
yes, investigate the issues as much as possible (and PROSECUTE), but don’t rely on the “word of Q” as any evidence.
Have we heard from Bagster? Starting to get worried. He was meeting with hostiles today.
Yeah, not buying it. Forget your password in a couple months? Really?
I believe Huber is part of the Mormon Chapter of the Anti-Trump Coup, like Romney and Flake.
“””Follow the Wives
Exactly.
You read my mind, haffast. Follow the Wives has been my assignment from Swordmaker. He requested that I do research on those that seem to need researching.
I saw a need to look at least cursorily at Karen Pence, so I did. There are a lot more leads into the Pences, but they are not high on my list at the moment to pursue.
Thanks for the link to the Wives Q drops!”””
YW. I’m intrigued with the idea that the wives may actually be the cabal control structure for the side that is diametrically opposed to our side.
If 180 opposed good/evil, why not gender in charge? Just masked by their men.
If I see something, I’ll say something. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.