Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MrEdd

It’s really not a big deal. Basically it makes non-radioactive helium and a very tiny amount of low level, very short half-life other waste.

Fusion would be a fantastic power source if contained and perfected. basically water as fuel, basically no waste.


9 posted on 11/20/2018 5:36:50 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

You still have to break down water.


11 posted on 11/20/2018 5:46:34 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: DesertRhino

“It’s really not a big deal. Basically it makes non-radioactive helium and a very tiny amount of low level, very short half-life other waste.

Fusion would be a fantastic power source if contained and perfected. basically water as fuel, basically no waste.”

Exactly. Also no worry about containment as if the torus is breached and the plasma escapes it will die before it reaches the magnets that contain it, in a Tokamak style reactor. Main byproduct is helium. 1 gallon of water contains enough deuterium to equal the thermal reaction of 379 gallons of gas.

The only problem with fusion today, which is just the same problem they had in the 90s is getting out more than you put in. The NBI method of heating the plasma requires more energy to heat the plasma to a fusion state that can be extracted from the plasma.

Despite all of the whiz bang new fangled toys we are still not getting a net positive energy returns.


18 posted on 11/20/2018 6:18:34 PM PST by Syntyr (Happiness is two at low eight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson