Were a lot of points the result directly or indirectly of the defenses?
I like a good 60 or 70 point game.
Usually if it goes above that, something is askew :)
It would usually mean no defense in the game.
But dirtboy says different.
Interesting.
Interceptions and fumbles on the offense’s side of the field can add up to a lot of points.
I did not watch it.
There were lots of turnovers. But a few of Maholmes interceptions were late desperate throw attempts.
Fun to watch, but not a classic game in my mind. You’ve got to play better defense than that.
Andy Reid sucks. He’ll never win. This game just showed again why the Saints are the class of the league right now.
The Rams had two defensive touchdowns, the Chiefs one. Difference in the game. And the two pick-sixes were pretty amazing. Worth looking up.
Combined the 2 teams’ offenses put up over 1,000 yards. Rams scored 2 defensive TDs and the Chiefs 1 defensive TD.
There were some defensive TDs....................
Between the two teams, I think 28 were directly the result of turnovers. Could have been higher, but I know that at least 28 were. That’s about 25% of all points scored in a game, which is exciting football. Two from strip sacks, two from interceptions.