Posted on 11/15/2018 10:06:57 PM PST by yesthatjallen
This is rich - they are basically trying to say any criticism of Soros or Soros groups is anti-semitism just because he’s of Jewish heritage when Soros got started by turning in Jews to the Nazis.
>>“Facebook’s response to our campaign, which challenged them to improve their platform and create safe conditions for Black people and other marginalized groups, was to fan the flames of anti-Semitism,” Rashad Robinson, the group’s president, said in a statement Thursday. “By suggesting to reporters that Color Of Change is acting as the puppet of Mr. Soros merely because he is one of our many funders, they have given oxygen to the worst anti-Semitic conspiracy theories of the white nationalist Trump base.”
I wonder how quickly Rashad would say something antisemitic if the subject was Israel.
Opposing George Soros is not “anti-Semitic”.
Dems vs. FB = red on red
root for heavy casualties
I love how they say “liberal financier” and not “notorious international human trafficker”.
This is baloney. RATS are unhappy that Facebook is used by normal Americans to expose antiAmerican sentiments and actions by the government. They do not like that normal Americans come in all colors and Facebook is a good way to expose truth. Since 2016, Facebook has been working to limit users who post antiestablishment information. Those folks are censored via algorithm.
Facebook is an over-controlling liberal POS that needs to be disbanded into 100 companies all owned by different owners.
Wow, those are some really lame ads / memes. The 4chan and Reddit/The_Donald folks routinely, weekly, put out much better stuff.
They’re crazy anyway. At this point, what difference does it make.
So, Russian ads, that no one saw are the reason that 60+ million people voted for Donald J Trump?
Facebook is doing just fine, and they will be happy to step up censorship against Republicans.
Lol, that is some really lame stuff
FB whole premise was based on misogyny. Can’t stand Mark Zuckerberg.
I also heard Schumer received millions of dollars in contributions from employees at FB. Schumer is complicit.
We knew what Soros was up to long before 2016.
The old guard is extremely aware that the new generation eats their lunch in social media effectiveness and they don’t like it one bit.
Lame—indeed!
Your post 13 makes sense of this confusing article.
They’re in denial that people just don’t want their brand of totalitarianism.
Me neither
Balony, this article is nothing more than an attempt at justifying silencing conservative viewpoints by calling them criminal. NYT knows FB is doing satans workwork.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.