Replies

I like his positive outlook.

However I see no reason why they haven’t perp. walked Hillary, Obama, Comey, and Brennan yet.

How long do we have to wait?

The email violations alone have been proven for a long time.

They are leaving dangerous criminals out there here.

Had they perp walked them earlier, there would have been kangaroo courts and perps set free because Obama and others had loaded the courts with Hillary & CO. friendly judges. POTUS has been cleansing the path to justice, cleaning up the FBI, Judiciary, DOJ- nominating wave upon wave of new judges, which the left has been stonewalling to the full extent of their ability. TxNMA said it best:

Also, there would be public outcry because they public is deluded, many think HIllary is Ghandi etc. and POTUS is restoring the rule of law so he's dotting all the "i"s and bringing the public opinion along with him. Some will never admit what HIllary is, but those in the middle have been listening the the MSM, trusting them, and so POTUS has been laying the groundwork so that enough of the public will be onboard when they they need to be.

Q is part of that plan - letting people know what Hillary and others really are. If it was easy to dismantle the deep state, it would have been done before. But the saturation level of corruption is so deep, it requires remaking the government to do it. But really, after all the years the perps have been given full rein, Trump is doing an AWESOME job of transforming government and the public opinion. He's gutted the FBI and no one talks about it. He's transforming everything he touches - ask our foreign trading partners. If the MSM were honestly reporting POTUS's accomplishments, people would be astounded at his incredible progress.

If you have a dem judge trying a case against a derper like Hillary, it would not last long. It would follow the pattern established by a Carter appointed federal judge in Birmingham when former Alabama dem governor Don Siegleman was on trial for one of his many corrupt dealings. When the jury was seated and jeopardy had attached, the judge decided to rule the prosecution’s evidence inadmissable. The U.S. Attorney had no choice but to dismiss the case, and they were barred by the Constitution from trying the case again. No testimony was taken and no evidence admitted, but Siegleman walked. The same thing will happen if a dem appointed judge is presiding over a derp trial. As soon as the trial passes the point of no return, the judge will issue a ruling that guts the prosecution’s case. The dems and their media will then go all out claiming that it was a witch hunt using fake evidence, while the derps walk out like Bill Ayers, guilty as sin but free as a bird.