Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ssschev; ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; generally; Wneighbor; mairdie; Swordmaker; ..

To: JockoManning; TEXOKIE
...those of us who have studied Q for a year and 2,400+ drops.
~~~~~~~~~~
We have had approx. 54 weeks to study Q.
Q has made 2493 post as of this writing.
There are 3 thread per week posted by the MOD (ThankQ)
There are an average of 2000 posts per thread (6000/wk)
6000 x 54 would be somewhere around 324,000 posts on the Q thread. Lets assume for the sake of discussion that 25% of the posts are slides, that would leave us somewhere in the neighborhood of 243,000 (+/-) posts that have discussed, hashed, reevaluated, and came to solid conclusions based on facts of proofs. (future proves past).

We know there is a lot of habbenings behind the scene that we do not know the timing of disclosure, but know they will occur. We are 3-6 months ahead of the normies and Non-FreeQ’s.

We have a great conglomeration of excellent minds working together to sis the information. There have been comments to let Q spread into the main forum.

I say NAY! NAY! Nay! The Q thread moderated by our dear MOD is vital to the cohesion of information. How would Bagster ever be able to collate the information into 3-5 Oricles per week?
How would TEXOKIE ever be able to keep the Quanteen organized? How would we see every meme from aMPU & KitJ? And the collection thereof by Little Jeremiah?
Swordmaker would be inundated with multiple requests to add the same information into his encyclopedic LexiCon.

If we went into the main forum and posted on different threads we would lose the continuity of information transfer.

After POTUS reveals Q, then we should copy comments as appropriate to the main forum threads. But our Q thread need to stay as the Main Thread of all things Q.
~~~~~
ssschev is done musing and walks into the Quanten Qitchen looking for some Quiche. He finds TEXOKIE in the Qitchen and politely request that she repost this to her ping list. TIA TEXOKIE

1,955 posted on 11/13/2018, 11:41:43 PM by ssschev (Pick up the can, throw out the trash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1889

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

I like your ideas and concepts in favor of a Q Thread to be maintained. What do other FReeQs think?

Forwarding to the texokie ping list per request from ssschev

*while ssschev is gnawing on the tasty morselicious bone given to him earlier, texokie goes to the Qanteen Qitchen and finds that piece of Quiche which she has been specially saving for him*


1,969 posted on 11/13/2018 10:24:24 PM PST by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1955 | View Replies ]


To: TEXOKIE

Maintain the Q thread. Relevant articles can be posted to the Forum or anyone who wants to post a chat or vanity about a topic.

But it’s best to have the info organized on it’s own thread.JMO


1,972 posted on 11/13/2018 10:31:38 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1969 | View Replies ]

To: TEXOKIE
I have mixed feelings about Q discussions on the wider FR forum.

For now, I think it's best as it is.

There will come a time after POTUS confirmation of Q when I don't think it would be viable to limit it--nor advisable. We will need to deal with the broader FR realities for the good of FR and the good of the country. We will not be able to hide forever in our safe-haven here.

1,988 posted on 11/14/2018 12:24:01 AM PST by JockoManning (http://www.zazzle.com/brain_truth for hats T's e.g. STAY CALM & DO THE NEXT LOVING THING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1969 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson