Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PIF
Except that they really don't have it because they are a miniscule voting block and don't really vote as a block, particularly in the two states where they are most numerous (Oklahoma and North Carolina) and spread out amoung the population.

Do you hear much about the Osage (Oklahoma) or Lumbee (North Carolina)? Probably not, because they are wealthier than the local population from oil and banking/real estate, respectively.

19 posted on 11/08/2018 2:14:29 PM PST by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

Actually SCOTUS ruled three times that “Treaty Tribes have Rights, all others have mere privileges which can be revoked at any given time”.

Does not matter whether the Tribes are a ‘voting block’ or not. They have Special Rights not granted to others ie Non-Indians - you me black yellow white tan green.

Their Rights are specifically enshrined in the Constitution while ours are just mentioned in a general way - despite claims to the contrary. SCOTUS agrees.

Courts continually rule for the Tribes even to the point of overruling SCOTUS when the plaintiff cannot afford to re-bring the case before SCOTUS. The Special Rights and Special Masters status is not political rather it is a matter of law granted on a case by case basis which usually means always.

If those other tribes are Treaty Tribes, then they fall into the above category, else they are just a body under the BLM jurisdiction. There is a difference.


31 posted on 11/08/2018 2:58:12 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson