[little jeremiah]

I think the legal battle is just beginning. Leading, hopefully, to cleaner elections.

Maybe that is (part of?) what Q is referring to:

YOU ARE WITNESSING THE SYSTEMATIC DESTRUCTION OF THE OLD GUARD.
Forced exposure.
Standard deviation broken long ago.
P—A—I—N

[Publius]

Forced exposure.
Standard deviation broken long ago.

Bingo! You broke the code!

With a standard deviation, Republicans should win as many disputed elections as Democrats, but they don't. That means somebody has his finger on the scale. This will all be exposed.

[bagster]

YOU ARE WITNESSING THE SYSTEMATIC DESTRUCTION OF THE OLD GUARD.
Forced exposure.
Standard deviation broken long ago.
P—A—I—N

What do you guys think Q means by "forced exposure"?

Exposure of the "old guard" or "Q's forced exposure will result in destruction of the old guard"?

Also, I always felt that Sessions was part of "the old guard" and I honestly think that the reasons to no longer trust DOES refer to Sessions.

Not that he's a derp, LJ (don't kill me), but that, being a member of the old guard, he is ensconced in old guard ways.

Old guard does not always equal deep state, in my not humble opinion.

But it's definitely not what is required in this new paradigm. War vs. Derp.

So there. You have my opinion on Sessions and I'm sticking to it.

p.s. Non-Derp, old guard are not useful in this fight. They just get in the way and take up the space that a fighter could have.

Bagster