Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: llevrok

The bigger question is, why were there only 33 out of 55 aircraft flyable leading up to the storm? That’s a pretty lousy readiness rate, especially for a top of the line fighter fresh off the assembly line.


5 posted on 10/16/2018 3:20:09 PM PDT by TADSLOS (I hate Russian Dolls. They are so full of themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TADSLOS

Yeah...kind of interesting isn’t it.

But we are “ready” for anything.


16 posted on 10/16/2018 3:46:09 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: TADSLOS

Pretty sure that is the normal percentage of aircraft that are airworthy in today’s military - thanks to our former POTUS.......the situation has been severe for many years.......


49 posted on 10/16/2018 6:41:27 PM PDT by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: TADSLOS

I would also like to know why costly aircraft under maintenance are maintained in such vulnerable parts of the country, as well as why they were not kept in weather-proof underground hangars.


52 posted on 10/16/2018 7:14:43 PM PDT by The Duke (President Trump = America's Last, Best Chanceh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson