Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the plane loss at Tindall AFB ? (Vanity)
10/16/2018 | Me

Posted on 10/16/2018 3:16:15 PM PDT by llevrok

I am no military vet, so this is perhaps a naive question -

A number of planes at Tindall were left on base and suffered partial or full damage. Some were F22's, no small loss.

Why were not all planes flown out the day before when it was obvious this was going to be ground zero for Hurricane Michael or near it?

Were they hanger queens and not flight ready? Or were there not the crews ready to fly them out?

It seems strange to me so many flying assets were left back.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: f22; hurricane; tindall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: GreyFriar

Glad you liked them.

My son and I took an Aviation Tour of SoCal a couple years ago and stopped there. It was a great place to visit. The coolest thing was chatting with a couple of FA-18 Growler pilots at the Mojave Spaceport and getting to sit in their cockpit, then watching them take off a few minutes later. They were getting hours and flying to Colorado Springs to have lunch with one of their Dads.


41 posted on 10/16/2018 5:18:15 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

As I understand it, this is part of Obunga’s legacy. He left the military run down and wear out, and did nothing to maintain what we had, let alone order anything new.


42 posted on 10/16/2018 5:21:20 PM PDT by Tucker39 ("It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible." George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal

The military - all branches - has only been allotted finite funds for rebuilding after the obama years.

Trump is making great strides in bringing them all up to combat readiness, but there are many branches. The Navy is way-low on ships, and planes. The Air Force, on planes; and I’m sure the other branches have their dire needs as well.

So, it comes down to PRIORITIES.

Any “parts” needed to make those planes flyable, are probably NOT made on the Florida coast. If the USAF hasn’t received said parts from said manufacturer, then said mechanics can’t put the said parts on the said planes to make them flyable.

Meanwhile, the aircraft that ARE airworthy were hustled out of there with all available pilots.

Aircraft mechanics don’t just sit around awaiting the parts...or the hurricane. They’ve got a lot more equipment to tend to, GPU Units, test gear, tools, tie downs, etc. I imaging for at least five days before Michael hit, the place was a bee hive of activity in getting ready.

The building and testing of the f-22 is supervised at Wright-Patterson AFB, in Wisconsin, so they need to share the “lack of parts” blame? They’re not in a hurricane zone.

There are 183 Raptors in the USAF inventory. Many of these storm-damaged one can probably be repaired, and they’re now bringing on the f-35.

We’re upgrading the Atlantic fleet, building new aircraft carriers, and giving the troops a well-deserved raise.

Now, exactly WHO do you want to blame for these damaged aircraft? What do you expect to be done that that person? Drawn and quartered? Life in prison? Shot at dawn?

I don’t know if you were in the military, or not...I was. Many factors determine their priorities, and at the operational level, the cost probably comes last, right after life and limb.

So, let’s all just cool our jets and wait on an official determination before we start pointing fingers.


43 posted on 10/16/2018 5:40:20 PM PDT by FrankR (You gotta stand for something, or you'll fall for anything!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon
I do not know the condition of the planes in the maintenance hangers, but an aircraft getting periodic maintenance is literally a totally disabled aircraft.

In my days on the flight lines in the 70s, most maintenance was done on the flight line. A plane was pulled into the hanger only for phased maintenance or a serious problem.

In civil aviation it is called a 100 hour inspection. Were you to look at one, you would wonder if it will ever fly again.

I've often wished that people, especially liberals, could see a plane in the hanger for one of the major phased maintenance periods. No engines, no radar, no seats, no instruments, numerous cables and hoses hanging everywhere, many, many panels (called doors) removed and the equipment inside removed. They would stop dead in their tracks and ask, "Who the hell is going to put this thing back together?" And the answer is: mostly 20-25 years old young men and women.

44 posted on 10/16/2018 5:47:30 PM PDT by libertylover (Despite government propaganda, I know the difference between a boy and a girl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

45 posted on 10/16/2018 5:51:30 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
I agree with everything you have said, except Wright-Patterson AFB is in Ohio.

I would like to add that I put the blame for the lack of spare parts on Obama and the republicans that went along with the sequester. Even though President Trump has increase military funding, some of the spares have long lead times, up to 2 or 3 years. And as you have so eloquently stated:

If the USAF hasn’t received said parts from said manufacturer, then said mechanics can’t put the said parts on the said planes to make them flyable.

I would also like to give a shout out to the military wives... most of the pilots that flew a plane to Wright-Patt left a wife and kids to deal with the hurricane on their own. I cannot imagine the stress they are under now.

46 posted on 10/16/2018 6:08:40 PM PDT by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

When I was in the AF we evacuated the aircraft unless they couldn’t fly. Seems they need some new commanders.


47 posted on 10/16/2018 6:13:44 PM PDT by Retvet (Retvet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt
Making a modern military aircraft ready to be loaded on a truck is an intensive manpower effort, removing the wings and tail, finding the prime movers, loading, ect., when you are also trying to get other deadlined hanger queens fit to fly out.

Couple that with the New Air Force personnel restrictions, that dependent families have to be evacuated, trannies have to have their meds, flight crews have maximum flight hours, union civil service civilians have to be coddled...

I'm surprised the AF got as many out as they did. Thanks, Obama...

48 posted on 10/16/2018 6:25:11 PM PDT by jonascord (First rule of the Dunning-Kruger Club is that you do not know you are in the Dunning-Kruger club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

Pretty sure that is the normal percentage of aircraft that are airworthy in today’s military - thanks to our former POTUS.......the situation has been severe for many years.......


49 posted on 10/16/2018 6:41:27 PM PDT by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: crusadersoldier

Because new F-22s are moneymakers for politicians and contractors .... reinforced concrete hangars are pocket change with a large amount of the expenses handed out to locals.


50 posted on 10/16/2018 6:50:47 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Start using cash and checks or the elite class and bankers will make "cashless" the norm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

You would think they could fit an F-22 on a flatbed.


51 posted on 10/16/2018 6:52:13 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS

I would also like to know why costly aircraft under maintenance are maintained in such vulnerable parts of the country, as well as why they were not kept in weather-proof underground hangars.


52 posted on 10/16/2018 7:14:43 PM PDT by The Duke (President Trump = America's Last, Best Chanceh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
“I would also like to know why costly aircraft under maintenance are maintained in such vulnerable parts of the country, as well as why they were not kept in weather-proof underground hangars.”

The Air Force should be required by the DOD to build Concrete and steel Aircraft shelters like we have in Saudi and in Europe.

As far as putting them underground. That's not going to happen, especially in at bases on the coast of Florida.

If you dig down 6 feet your likely to hit water.

53 posted on 10/16/2018 7:37:40 PM PDT by puppypusher ( The world is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
"I am no military vet, so this is perhaps a naive question - ..."

The question isn't naïve but the idea that someone here might be close enough to whoever made those decisions to know the answer to it is.

54 posted on 10/16/2018 7:39:17 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I once flew a CH-53D to Pensacola for overhaul. Our squadron was so short on some spare parts that we had to remove 5 of the 6 main rotor blades from the helo we flew down and install them on the helo we were picking up from overhaul to fly it back to North Carolina.

We had several cannibalized hangar queens. 1977


55 posted on 10/16/2018 7:54:57 PM PDT by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
The building and testing of the f-22 is supervised at Wright-Patterson AFB, in Wisconsin, so they need to share the “lack of parts” blame?

Sounds like the entire program has been poorly run. It is a relatively new plane, and we have no spare parts? Ten percent of the aircraft lost in one event. If it was ten or twenty aircraft losing one or two is understandable. Is this strategic incompetence to get rid of this aircraft as quickly as possible?

What do you expect to be done that that person? Drawn and quartered? Life in prison? Shot at dawn?

Spare everyone the melodrama.

56 posted on 10/16/2018 8:15:21 PM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Paal Gulli

Just looking for a reasonable explanation, not state secrets, Paal. Not to worry.


57 posted on 10/16/2018 11:59:49 PM PDT by llevrok (Vote while it's still legal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Stories indicate they were incapable or unsafe for flight...since it may be a readiness glitch, it may not be they type story that comes 100% into the public realm.

Less than 2 years with Trump in office so much of what he is doing hasn't been fully realized at the operational/supply-line levels.

58 posted on 10/17/2018 3:01:35 AM PDT by trebb (Those who don't donate anything tend to be empty gasbags...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FtrPilot

Would have loved to see your night AR photo, but alas, it doesn’t want to be seen. Even copying the link doesn’t work as it indicates it isn’t on the server.


59 posted on 10/17/2018 5:28:58 AM PDT by wita (Always and forever, under oath in defense of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson