Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the plane loss at Tindall AFB ? (Vanity)
10/16/2018 | Me

Posted on 10/16/2018 3:16:15 PM PDT by llevrok

I am no military vet, so this is perhaps a naive question -

A number of planes at Tindall were left on base and suffered partial or full damage. Some were F22's, no small loss.

Why were not all planes flown out the day before when it was obvious this was going to be ground zero for Hurricane Michael or near it?

Were they hanger queens and not flight ready? Or were there not the crews ready to fly them out?

It seems strange to me so many flying assets were left back.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: f22; hurricane; tindall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: llevrok

combination of deadline aircraft, shortage of pilots, and loss of ferry time (ie...fly an f22 to LRAFB. 8 hours mandatory sleep, take a slow c130 back ...8 hours sleep, ferry another).
Should have been an EO putting all that safety shit on a wartime/national security footing to unass the AO with assets like that, IMHO, however, I’m thinking they had good reason. Mayhaps not. Hell if I know.


21 posted on 10/16/2018 3:49:06 PM PDT by DCBryan1 (Quit calling them liberals, progs, socialists, or democrats. Call them what they are: COMMUNISTS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I saw a news report that said there were maintenance and spare parts issues so they could not be flown out. If true it’s pathetic.

It is a way of life with the peacetime military attitude politicians have. They expect the military to do "More, Better with Less" until they reach a point where they have to do everything with nothing.

All branches need re-equipping and rejuvenation like the kind experienced under President Reagan.

22 posted on 10/16/2018 3:52:25 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: deport

Thanks for including the only factual link in the thread.

It will be interesting to see if anyone takes the hit for having to leave four F-22’s to the fate of the storm. Pretty expensive decision, with really no recourse due to what can and can’t fly. Frankly, IMHO Tyndall looks like it should be abandoned and save the inordinate cost of rebuilding. Especially since the scenario could be repeated short of storm hardening all of the hangers.


23 posted on 10/16/2018 3:53:12 PM PDT by wita (Always and forever, under oath in defense of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

They could have been trucked out! If they had been 100 miles west they would have survived intact. Someone should be fired.


24 posted on 10/16/2018 3:55:00 PM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Probably being maintained at the time without enough warning to get them air worthy.


25 posted on 10/16/2018 3:59:20 PM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wita
Tyndall is a key USAF base for airborne weapons testing in the Gulf range. It's mission is so unique that rebuilding is an option. Other options include moving the functions of R&D, live firing, range and telemetry capabilities and the associated personnel and logistics to other bases that use the Gulf range.

It is very possible that a joint base with the Navy may emerge at NAS Pensacola in the short term and may also be the long term solution.

26 posted on 10/16/2018 4:00:14 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wita
It will be interesting to see if anyone takes the hit for having to leave four F-22’s to the fate of the storm.

There were 4 F-22's left behind in just one squadron.

Tyndall is home for a whole wing of F-22's.

And right on the beach in Florida.

27 posted on 10/16/2018 4:01:03 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Normally you hurivac all flyable aircraft to a safe haven. Hangar queens you ry to move to the “safest” area and hope for the best.


28 posted on 10/16/2018 4:02:05 PM PDT by maddog55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

How come you can say ‘spokeswoman’ but not spokesman?


29 posted on 10/16/2018 4:02:18 PM PDT by A strike (Academia is almost as racist as Madison Avenue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wita
IMHO Tyndall looks like it should be abandoned and save the
inordinate cost of rebuilding.

....

That is my though also. Of course you move to a
different location and find differing obstacles.

30 posted on 10/16/2018 4:03:56 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Midwesterner53

Sounds like Trump needs to go crack some skulls. It is unacceptable that nearly half of the top of the line very expensive fighters at this base are inoperable.


31 posted on 10/16/2018 4:09:35 PM PDT by SACK UP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

good photos, thank you.


32 posted on 10/16/2018 4:14:02 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

The damaged f22s were a command failure. If a naval officer let that much damage occur to equipment he signed for, it would be the last day of his command.

I’m not saying the wing commander was necessarily incompetent, or that he didn’t do everything in his power to minimize loss. I will say that the wing commander better hope there is a good amount of evidence proving he executed a sound disaster preparedness operation and exhausted every opportunity to protect that equipment.

A fighter aircraft like the f22 isn’t easy to strap onto a pickup and drive off the base, but if there was no plan in place for a fighter wing based in florida to absorb a big hurricane, that’s a big freaking problem.


33 posted on 10/16/2018 4:15:29 PM PDT by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

I do not know the condition of the planes in the maintenance hangers, but an aircraft getting periodic maintenance is literally a totally disabled aircraft.

In civil aviation it is called a 100 hour inspection. Were you to look at one, you would wonder if it will ever fly again.

I suspect that military aircraft are maintained under a “progressive” method, similar to the airlines, but still the airplane is unflyable until put back together.

I doubt they had the manpower or the parts to restore 20 or 30 aircraft to flyable condition in a 3 day or so notice.

Don’t forget that this started out as an ordinary Florida type storm and only turned into the monster in the last few days.

We all learned a lesson from this storm. Here in Piedmont North Carolina, we expected a tropical low pressure system that had wound down to a heavy rain area with some flooding.

Instead we had a train wreck.


34 posted on 10/16/2018 4:23:04 PM PDT by old curmudgeon (There is no situation so terrible, so disgraceful, that the federal government can not make worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Silly comment. Trump said yesterday because the planes were under repair and the engines were off the jets and couldn’t be flown out. The storm developed so fast that there was no alternative. Unions...lol


35 posted on 10/16/2018 4:23:53 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A strike

That was a direct quote from the link I provided. Not my wording.


36 posted on 10/16/2018 4:35:30 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Some of the threads on this post are ridiculous.

No commander, no pilot, is going to order, or fly, a jet that is not safe.

Naturally, the F-35’s are taken to safety first, and maybe there weren’t any trained pilots to take the others away.

In the Navy, during emergencies, or wartime, planes damaged to non-flyable condition are routinely jettisoned over the side, into the deep blue.

There are always some planes down for maintenance, awaiting parts, or grounded otherwise. With a major hurricane bearing down, you don’t have the time to repair them. So they got the ones that were in flyable condition off the base by the time “Michael” hit the base.

Planes, in emergencies, are expendable...no matter what the cost.

The F-22’s are long-since paid for; There’s a good chance that some of them can still be put back into service, but once the storm is 30 miles off shore, and there are no parts, it’s just a little late for that.

Past jets, such as the Century F-series jets, were just as expensive in their day, but the ones that are not on static display, in museums, or at the “Boneyard”, were converted to remote control drones and used as targets.

Trump promised a lot of things, and he’s kept most of his promises, but he did not “promise” (or cause) the hurricane.

It’s not about unions, it’s not about any of that...it’s about an uncontrollable storm and the things that were caught in it’s path.

How about the rest of the area, how about Mexico Beach? Did Trump do that, too, for the “builders” unions?

Grow up people, shit happens.


37 posted on 10/16/2018 4:45:19 PM PDT by FrankR (You gotta stand for something, or you'll fall for anything!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Based upon other stories, most of the planes that were NOT removed from the base were undergoing repairs.


38 posted on 10/16/2018 4:54:51 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

The world is full of clueless people. They all, it seems, have an internet connection. Take care of the people first, and then do whatever you can about the equipment. I would love to see one of these bozos playing a Wing Commander. More than likely, they couldn’t manage a paper route.


39 posted on 10/16/2018 4:56:02 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

The storm isn’t the problem. The fact that so many planes are unflyable and no contingency for the storm is the problem.

If you are on the coast you will have a hurricane eventually. If the loss was a couple of planes, oh well. Twenty planes is a whole different case. The time to do something isn’t when a hurricane is bearing down on you.


40 posted on 10/16/2018 5:13:52 PM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson