To: knarf
I do look forward to her being nominated but wonder if the push for her, like this, make her too political, causing President Trump to pick someone else when the time comes.
4 posted on
10/08/2018 4:59:56 PM PDT by
Reno89519
(No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
To: Reno89519
I do look forward to her being nominated but wonder if the push for her, like this, make her too political, causing President Trump to pick someone else when the time comes. Maybe, but I was thinking he basically was saving her as a RBG replacement, i.e., replace a woman with a woman.
36 posted on
10/08/2018 5:08:17 PM PDT by
libertylover
(Despite government propaganda, I know the difference between a boy and a girl.)
To: Reno89519
“make her too political”
as long as Trump is President, ANY nomination is going to made “too political” by the Senate scum ... so Trump might as well nominate the person he thinks is best regardless of what the Dems might think ...
150 posted on
10/08/2018 6:36:29 PM PDT by
catnipman
((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
To: Reno89519
When we pick up 5 more US Senate seats in November (ND, IND, MT, MO and FL), plus Marsha Blackburn in for Bob Corker, it wont matter a whole lot whether the very low IQ Murkowski like the nomination or not. We will still push the nomination through.
To: Reno89519
I’d wager Trump has some good female jurists in line to replace the female Justices that may leave...hard to attack him and remain credible by claiming it’s a political ploy after howling so loud about not having enough women in high places...
193 posted on
10/09/2018 3:26:39 AM PDT by
trebb
(So many "experts" with so little experience in what they preach....even here...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson