Posted on 09/25/2018 5:07:16 PM PDT by BenLurkin
It's a terrifying weapon: a nuclear-powered cruise missile that can fly anywhere on the planet, possibly spewing radioactivity as it goes. In March, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that his nation had successfully tested just such a machine.
But new satellite imagery of a remote Russian test site suggests that the missile may not be working as well as claimed.
The imagery, shared exclusively with NPR by academic researchers, shows ships removing equipment from the site where the missile was tested on a remote, arctic archipelago. Between July and August, blue shipping containers and structures vanished, implying that testing has stopped, at least for now.
"Russia seems to be closing up shop," says Jeffrey Lewis, an arms control expert at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey in California who led the new analysis. "That suggests to me that the program may be experiencing some developmental challenges."
Lewis says that satellites also spotted several ships loitering in waters north of the site in late July and early August. That could have been an effort by the Russians to recover the remains of a test missile that reportedly crashed after flying briefly in late 2017.
Both the U.S. and Russia have possessed nuclear-armed missiles for decades, but a nuclear-powered missile is different. Such a missile would fly using thrust from a small nuclear reactor.
"It essentially has an unlimited range because it'll fly as long as the reactor is going," Lewis says.
But a nuclear-powered missile also comes with more than a few problems. The U.S. briefly looked into the idea in the 1950s and 1960s. But a prototype engine produced exhaust that was highly radioactive.
"It was spewing lethal amounts of radioactivity the entire time," Lewis says. In the end, he says, the U.S. decided it was a "crazy idea."
"The Russians have apparently decided that it's not a crazy idea," he adds.
Russia's nuclear-powered missile was unveiled to the world in March during Putin's annual address to the nation. Putin boasted that the missile had "unlimited range" and could not be intercepted by U.S. missile defense systems. A graphic shown during the speech depicted the new missile flying southward over the Atlantic, and around the tip of South America, then turning north in the Pacific and striking what appears to be Hawaii.
He also claimed that the missile had a successful test launch in late 2017.
The U.S. intelligence community quickly disputed that claim. According to reports leaked to the press, the Pentagon believes that after a test in November the missile flew for just a few minutes before crashing into the sea. Several other tests also ended in failure.
Russia tested the missile in its old nuclear weapons testing ground, a chain of barren islands known as Novaya Zemlya. During much of the year, "it's just covered in ice in the satellite images," says Anne Pellegrino, a research associate at the Middlebury Institute. "It's actually quite beautiful when you look at it."
Pellegrino, Lewis and colleagues used photos from Putin's speech to locate the precise site of the launch. They then observed the area using commercial satellites from the company Planet. Combined with ship-tracking data, the team was able to watch as the missile site was being decommissioned in July and August. They also saw ships, including one used to handle nuclear fuel, in the same area where the cruise missile likely went down. The evidence is circumstantial, but it's enough to make Pellegrino believe the missile test was a bust. "I think that it was a spectacular failure and fell into the ocean," she says.
Failure or not, Lewis says the test should be concerning. "This is a resumption of the arms race," he says. The U.S. and Russia would be better off if they could "negotiate an arms control treaty that covered a lot of these weird systems that belong only in science fiction."
There are, of course, other possibilities for what's happening at the missile site. Lewis and Pellegrino say that it's possible that testing is moving to another location, although neither believes other test sites would be safe enough, given the radioactive nature of the weapon.
Winter is also coming to the island chain, and Russian officials may have just decided to clean up ahead of the snow, says Pavel Podvig, an arms control expert who runs a blog called Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces.
Even if the missile did fail, Podvig says, the program likely lives on. After being mentioned by Putin himself, Podvig says, there would be enormous pressure to push through failure.
"I would guess, given the high profile," Podvig says, "that the system will return in some shape or form."
.
Russia is 99% propaganda.
The most terrifying weapon would be the Alpha-Omega missile. There are pictures of it somewhere.
Because.......COLLUSION!!!!
Where’s that “Russian Collusion”, eh, Democrats?
Oh, that’s right. It was all lies by the Obama administration and Hillary, wasn’t it?
Yes, lies by Hillary and the Obama administration.
Nope, it obviously worked perfectly and far beyond the Russian’s expectations the first time it was tested and no more development is necessary.
They are saving buckets full of Rubles that they can now spend on undermining our Election Process to hand the Democrats every contested Seat in the House and Senate.
I don’t know why our Intelligence Agencies and our Military don’t see this. It’s as plain as the Mole on Obama’s face.
Should I have said “fly”?
We tried it back in in 1961 and later in 1964 - Project Pluto.
Didn’t work then, won’t work now.
Other weapons systems have quirks. The US SR-71 leaks fuel like a sieve until it is warmed up. Doesn't mean it can't fly over the Kremlin like a bat outta hell and take pictures.
I reviewed the video, and the claim is false. It’s too small. Although from the sound of a launch in the video, it *might* be driven with solid fuel, it’s not nuclear powered. The one in the shop is certainly not.
It’s silly propaganda, too, like the Iranian hoaxes.
It did work then, and will work better now, because back then, people had to fly it. They would have gotten radiation poisoning. Now, we can design electronics to work in large neutron fields. I have designed electronics myself that would survive a 1Mrad dose. It can be done. They could do it.
If you consider a 22 mile range as a threat, your call.
As an aside, any (ICBM) re-entry vehicle would considered hyper-sonic, so the idea of a nuke powered, air-breathing, cruise missile as a alternate system is a tad...IMO - ludicrous.
YMMV
I’d love to see the physics of a nuclear reactor providing thrust. If it converts heat to steam, the amount of water necessary to convert to steam and power a missile would require so much water and so large a reactor, it wouldn’t get off the ground.
The principle behind the nuclear ramjet was relatively simple: motion of the vehicle pushed air in through the front of the vehicle (ram effect), a nuclear reactor heated the air, and then the hot air expanded at high speed out through a nozzle at the back, providing thrust.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pluto
You mean like the one Charlton Heston triggered in Beneath the Planet of the Apes?
Exactly. That was the pun. As far as I know then you are the only one that got it. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.