Acknowledged and will comply forthwith, Jim.
Thanks. Will spread the word.
FReegards
Will comply, however, current events (declas) are making it obvious that Q is not a conspiracy but an actual news happening!
And neither should their opinion dreamings be posted to the NEWS section.
Thanks.
More power to them, I think their research into “who’s who” in the gov will be useful (and they have a good time).
But Q doesn’t impress.
Q predicted you would post this on April the 10th
A freeper will
on the red carpet day
assign us to our own post
or go away
Ack.
Done and with no regrets, your board, your rules
God Bless
100American
I would hope that you would extend this to all the Anti Q threads as well. You know all the Q people are retarded type of threads, that have the false pretense of being a news article. All they do is provoke the kind of responses that you say that you don’t want.
Thanks
I use three Q Tips after I shower.
Good call, IMHO. There is enough junk content and vacuous opining in news and information without unsubstantiated Q-crap littering these pages even more.
Q is Barron Trump.
That kid just has to be bored.
I like to read the Q threads, because I like to watch things happen....or not.
I have been a freeper for a long time, I remember when the total number of threads in a day was maybe 20.
Back before the Monica Lewinsky imbroglio, we had considerably fewer members and Drudge had less than a milion hits daily:
Druge reported on Monica, and we had the story too, but the MSM embargoed it. The strange effect that for 6 months or so the public was almost totally unaware, whereas we had scores of resident experts, here. It was like we and the MSM were in parallel universes, side-by-side, yet somehow walled off from one another.
Monica’s personal phone number was posted here, and some Frepers called it up, just for the hell of it.
When the story fiiiinally broke in the MSM, Drudge linked to us and we got VERY MANY new members because of that:
We had a guy named “Quidam” and on a daily basis he claimed to be an unnamed insider. Quidam made numerous cryptic, mysterious predictions.
One of them was that “the grey suits around about to start walking up That Hill...”: Quidam meant that important eminance-gris were going to ask Bill Clinton to resign. Quidam never spoke plainly, there was always a lot of mystique. Incompleteness was Quidam’s rule.
The pronouncement about Bill Clinton being slated for Removal From Office was seized upon with great zeal, passed around and made famous.
NOTHING HAPPENED.
Then, like now, citizens were encouraged to sit back and passively WATCH developments play-out, a bit theater-goers taking in a movie, instead of speaking out and DOING STUFF.
The number of ways in which Quidam resembles Q is amazing.
A better word choice, though, is SUSPICIOUS.
Will do Jim. Thanks
You make the rules, Jim.
But just at the time Q has been shown not to be a conspiracy theory or a LARP, this is the time it cannot be openly talked about here on FR.
It is ironic.
I have noticed a virulent anti Q contingent on FR since the beginning of Q.
Future proves past, so we will soon find out who is correct.
Thanks - it’s time...
Will do. Just a note for the general forum folks.
The Q-thread continues to welcome you and your skepticism on the Q-threads. We enjoy figuring things out and debating/arguing within the thread. So many of you hit and run on the Q-thread. We ask that you simply post and stick around to engage.
Thanks
LOL! Good one!
I think it’s a good time to remind folks of some of the basic forum rules, as stated on the FR home page:
“Do keep it clean - A bruise or two between Freepers is tolerable, but refrain from abusive attacks, engaging in senseless flame wars, and using profane language. Considering the range of topics we discuss, it’s hard to be a family site, but that’s what we aim for when at all possible.”
“Don’t jump threads - If you get involved in an argument in one thread, it’s considered poor manners to restart the previous argument in the middle of an unrelated thread.”
“Please enjoy our forum, but also please remember to use common courtesy when posting and refrain from posting personal attacks, profanity, vulgarity, threats, racial or religious bigotry, or any other materials offensive or otherwise inappropriate for a conservative family audience.”
The whole Q debate, has created an environment that is reminiscent of the great Trump vs. Cruz wars that raged here during 2016, though (as yet) not as vicious or pervasive.
There is altogether too much of the sorts of behavior that are specifically called out in the above excerpts as unwelcome. Any discussion of Q topics will generally lead to name calling, personal insults, profanity directed at specific users, and the like. People on BOTH sides are guilty and almost always the same people are involved.
It’s annoying, childish, totally unnecessary, and it does nothing whatsoever to advance one position or the other. If calling someone else an idiot once doesn’t change their mind, doing it 20 times will probably not succeed either.
Just stop it. We aren’t children squabbling over toys in a sandbox.
I urge you to make it clear that such behavior continues to be unwelcome here, even to the point of suspending or zotting the worst offenders.