To: ETL
Don’t fool with mother nature.
2 posted on
09/10/2018 7:41:39 AM PDT by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: rktman
3 posted on
09/10/2018 7:43:20 AM PDT by
DIRTYSECRET
(urope. Why do they put up with this.)
To: rktman
At some point the science will overwhelm their fantasies, and this will all come crashing down. We’ll be left with trillions of dollars in equipment that just can’t compete with nuclear and petrochemical power generation.
4 posted on
09/10/2018 7:43:46 AM PDT by
rarestia
(Repeal the 17th Amendment and ratify Article the First to give the power back to the people!)
To: rktman
In 2017, the global energy demand was only 18 terawatts, so this is obviously much more energy than is currently needed worldwide"Fair enough. I could buy this.
So, how are they planning to get all this power from Sub-Saharan Africa to, say, Philadelphia?
Not a unique problem. Generation of power is the easy part. Transmission and distribution is the difficult piece. But Liberals don't like to be confused with facts and tough questions.
27 posted on
09/10/2018 8:09:57 AM PDT by
wbill
To: rktman
First show me a climate model that actually works. None of them do.
31 posted on
09/10/2018 8:15:15 AM PDT by
D Rider
To: rktman
Only a Liberal idiot would wish to INCREASE the temperature in a desert......
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson