> Remember too that POTUS appointed Sessions which was a mistake and POTUS has sincerely said so.
This is not true. Q has spoken, Trust Sessions. Thou sayest the Q.
> RR was recommended and POTUS followed through hearing that RR would be inclined to review the performance of Comey objectively.
True.
> The telltale sign of RR’s allegiance is his wife Barsoomian. She wore the pants. RR’s life, his career, his social life, everything was tied to the Clinton culture and his wife was front and center in the middle of that culture.
I also agree with this.
> The thing to understand is that POTUS was at first trusting and over time shifted his views as he saw performance and results.
This is not true. Trump knew everything before becoming President.
> He did not know Sessions all that well,
Sessions reputation in DC is beyond reproach.
> But early on RR slipped through the cracks and he has remained there because of politics. His tenure is coming to an end soon we hope.
I also agree with this. The only way RR is neutral or white is if he was presented the evidence against him and flipped. They set him up.
Never underestimate those behind Trump even if you underestimate Trump, which nobody should do.
Just my $00.02.
> “This is not true. Q has spoken, Trust Sessions. Thou sayest the Q.”
It was POTUS that said to TRUST SESSIONS. Look up the early views of POTUS towards Sessions and it’s all there. POTUS wanted to give Sessions a chance to do his job.
Later POTUS was severely disappointed with Sessions.
Q was merely reflective of the WH view of Sessions.
The nearly indestructible bond between Jeff Sessions and Donald Trump
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/the-nearly-indestructible-bond-between-jeff-sessions-and-donald-trump/2017/03/02/53aa4af8-ff59-11e6-99b4-9e613afeb09f_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.3d92efda6f4e
Things changed:
For Trump and Sessions, a warm beginning turned into an icy standoff
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/for-trump-and-sessions-a-warm-beginning-turned-into-an-icy-standoff/2017/07/30/049aa4a2-73a4-11e7-9eac-d56bd5568db8_story.html?utm_term=.8d10c65b015d