She's got Occasio-Cortez eyes.
1 posted on
09/03/2018 6:53:36 PM PDT by
simpson96
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: simpson96
I see a future at CNN for this loony
2 posted on
09/03/2018 6:56:02 PM PDT by
digger48
To: simpson96
"Don't even..."
3 posted on
09/03/2018 6:56:35 PM PDT by
montag813
To: simpson96
4 posted on
09/03/2018 6:56:44 PM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: simpson96
5 posted on
09/03/2018 6:57:10 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: simpson96
Drugs are bad for you, m’kay.
6 posted on
09/03/2018 6:58:32 PM PDT by
Beowulf9
To: Lazamataz
8 posted on
09/03/2018 7:01:52 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: simpson96
He said the grabbed the woman by her arm and drug DRAGGED her outside. The editor should be shot.
9 posted on
09/03/2018 7:03:55 PM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: simpson96
Next time, just get your mushrooms from Trader Joe. Don’t buy from that online grower who calls himself “The Shaman”.
Your Twitter pals tried to warn you!
To: simpson96
I’d love to be sympathetic but monkeys are out to get everybody, lady!
11 posted on
09/03/2018 7:05:53 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: simpson96
Our legal system needs a reassesment of mental illness, both natural and artificial. That is, right now the law puts the emphasis on the people with defective minds, not on those who are *abused* by such people.
Think about it. If a dangerous lunatic threatens you, you do not have any means of telling if they are mentally ill, or hiked up on alcohol and/or drugs.
And the point is, in the eyes of the law, it shouldn’t matter. You are “the victim” and the attacker is “the attacker.”
With gun liberty, if a nut attacks you with a brick, you may legally shoot them to death. And it does not matter, and should not matter, what their personal problems are. So why does the law take a different attitude?
If mitigation happens, it should be part of sentencing, not a consideration during the trial, unless the offender is so very nuts they cannot walk and chew gum at the same time.
13 posted on
09/03/2018 7:07:41 PM PDT by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
(Liberals have become moralistic, dogmatic, sententious, self-righteous, pinch-faced prudes.)
To: simpson96
OH NO..MONKEY, that’s so racist/sarc
To: simpson96
'Monkeys are out to get me' said woman trying to take baby, says reportBullfrogs On My Mind, David Bromberg.
15 posted on
09/03/2018 7:22:28 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: simpson96
It’s the flying monkeys you really have to worry about.
To: simpson96
Brandi, you’re a fine girl, and a good wife you would be...
...If you just weren’t so BAT CRA-ZY.
17 posted on
09/03/2018 7:30:56 PM PDT by
Fido969
(In!)
To: simpson96
“She has been charged with kidnapping conspiracy and two count of third-degree burglary, according to jail records.”
I didn’t expect that. Sounds more trippy drug mania episode to me per the article, but maybe they don’t have a law for that. I wonder if she was stalking them or something.
Freegards
18 posted on
09/03/2018 7:33:16 PM PDT by
Ransomed
To: simpson96
TRIGGERED !!
To: onedoug
To: simpson96
How very sad this is .. glad no one was hurt.
22 posted on
09/03/2018 8:01:02 PM PDT by
tomkat
(can sometimes be a softy)
To: simpson96
A little bit of makeup and some hair styling attention, she could be innocent...
23 posted on
09/03/2018 8:18:23 PM PDT by
spiderpig
(does whatever a SpiderPig does)
To: simpson96
24 posted on
09/03/2018 8:23:53 PM PDT by
Spok
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
