Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Black

I think it would help if you kept up on the thread. You’d know I have already asked FReepers not to post conspiracy stuff, including content the board owner has banned. I didn’t “get” 9/11 conspiracy out of panel #1. If you do, you could call it to my (our) attention or simply ask the Admin to remove it. We work together to keep such stuff off the site.

Jack: “You took this image off or reddit where it is claimed to be....”

If you read the thread, you’d see that I have already posted twice that I picked up the meme from other FReepers. I don’t think anyone tracks down the origin of memes and investigates other memes made by that person before deciding whether to post it.

Jack: “Nothing Here to See (voting is useless)”

If you kept up on the thread, you’d know we believe that voting is critical to the restoration of the republic. I believe whomever made the meme (I haven’t investigated the author so I don’t know if you’re correct) was saying the Dems have been cheating.

Jack: “In general Free Republic has never really supported being a platform for insane conspiracy theories, like the CIA/Mossad/Rothchilds blew up the Twin Towers, so I’m sort of surprised to see it popping up on every new thread as part of the official introduction.”

Well, as I said I don’t get what you got out of panel #1. I wonder why you didn’t ask about it on the thread, or ask the Admin to see if others interpret it that way too. Also, if you kept up on the thread you’d know I’ve only posted it on two threads. What is an “official introduction”? Is it anything posted within the first 10 posts or?

Jack: “What do you mean exactly by claiming that ....”

If you kept up on the thread, you’d know I didn’t create that meme. Did you ask Admin to remove it before creating this “piece”?

Jack:”Do you acknowledge the danger in promoting anonymous memes from 8chan that claim that all our elections are rigged, especially in the run up to a crucial election where Republican turnout is likely to be critical to the GOP holding the House and Trump avoiding impeachment?”

I don’t know who created this meme (I didn’t) and I thought you accused me of getting it from Reddit (not 8ch) but it doesn’t allege that we shouldn’t vote - it points to allegations that prior voting was rigged by Democrats, something President Trump has been saying for months (if you followed POTUS’s twitter like we do, you’d know that). I and other FReepers believe the upcoming vote is crucial, just like the 2016 election meant everything to our country’s survival.

Jack: “Are you aware of any evidence to support the theory that JFK Jr. and his passengers were murdered, as the meme suggests, to clear the path for Hillary to run for the Senate in NY, as the meme clearly suggests?”

I didn’t get that out of the meme-of-unknown-origin, but if you did, you could point it out. If you kept up on the thread, you’d know I’ve already specifically asked FReeQs not to post JFK Jr. conspiracy theories and you could help us out by pointing to that interpretation of it.

Jack: “Again, no evidence is presented to support this claim, but now the entire Q thread is infected with people talking like we know this happened.”

Again, if you kept up on our threads you’d know the “entire Q thread” is not infected with this. We work together to remove objectionable content from the thread. You could just LET US KNOW your concerns in two lines of text max or ask the Admin.

Jack: “PS: Who is (they) referred to in the 8chan meme? This seems like it might be a watered down form of the anti-Semitic (((they))). It’s hard to read 8chan because of the sickening and retarded anti-Semitism that fills every thread, including the Qanon threads. I’d hate to see that start showing up over here.”

Sounds like wishful thinking on your part, Jack. Really stretching it. You’ve been on our thread for months now working to undermine and discourage Q research (and researchers), but you don’t know what we do/do not support and you didn’t realize we work together to keep objectionable content off FR. So, you wrote an overblown post that works to portray us and the threads in a negative light, right down to suggesting we just might be heading toward antisemitism. We’ve done nothing to deserve that.

Let’s make a deal. I’ll stop posting that meme, and ask others not to post that meme. In return, you cease to post on our threads, given that you find us and our pursuits so thoroughly tainted and disreputable. Deal?


612 posted on 09/03/2018 12:30:45 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

He (((Jack’s))) off today.


635 posted on 09/03/2018 1:07:39 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

Jack Black = Black Jack

“Outlander”

http://outlander.wikia.com/wiki/Jonathan_Randall

Jonathan Randall, commonly known as “Black Jack”, was a minor knight in England during the time of the Jacobite Rising of 1745. He played a part in quashing the rebellion, and was heavily financially supported by the Duke of Sandringham. In 1746 Randall married Mary Hawkins, who bore him a son, Denys. Frank Randall, a historian and husband to Claire Beauchamp Randall in the 20th century, traces his family history back to Jack Randall.


642 posted on 09/03/2018 1:15:22 PM PDT by COUNTrecount (If only Harvey Weinstein's bathrobe could talk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
I do keep up on the threads, and my posting history shows it.

I did comment about this meme in the thread, not elsewhere.

I think it's a lot more valuable to dissect these false memes publicly on the thread, rather than just disappear them into a black hole.

My comments that the entire Q thread "is infected with this" was specifically about the idea that there have been secret pardons. I've seen at least a dozen posts that assume that that claim is true.

I did ask you about the meme, that's the point of the comment. I guess i could have used PM, but in general we put stuff out there to get feedback and most of it is public.

I certainly have had my share of comments (both positive and negative) on my posts. (And, I have had a few PMs too).

I'm sorry that you (and some others) think I am working to undermine Q research. That's really not the case. I feel I am contributing to Q research by using some different tools than most people, who seem to rely on interpreters, almost exclusively, many of whom I find pretty useless.

A lot of stuff gets dragged into the threads that way. I much prefer Bagster's approach of short commentary on the actual Q posts, and some generalized explanation to, say, Neon Revolt who seems to use Q as a jumping off point for his own hobby horses.

I dont' find you or this thread "tainted and disreputable" at all, I did find that meme objectionable.

That's all.

I really wish you liked having me around, but apparently you don't. I'll think about your request to stop posting on your threads for a bit, I'm not sure if I will agree to your "deal".

Please continue or discontinue use of the meme based on your own judgements about it's accuracy and usefulness in getting us closer to the truth. You have my input, and your judgement on the matter is enough.

Happy Labor Day. I'm going to go play now.


649 posted on 09/03/2018 1:22:13 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson