Replies

WWG1WGA

bump

Great explanation of crimes and treason of the entire cabal

Thank you for that timeline summary. Very educational.

With respect to graphic #2, I've been saying for some time (at least a year if anyone wants to review my posts) that we cannot rule out the possibility that the whitehats rigged the election in favor of Trump. (Or, conversely, unrigged the proglibs rigging in favor of the Beast.)

Perhaps the perspective that provides the most clarity and sense is to evaluate our current situation like many have been suggesting: that we are truly engaged in a (cold) civil war. In this case, wouldn't there be factions within the military fighting aligned dark forces in various deep state strongholds like State, Justice and CIA? So would be the logic that certain parties in the military actually took their oaths seriously about defending the nation against enemies foreign and domestic.

Evaluated in this context, everything begins to make sense. Why was/is Trump so confident? Why is the DS so shocked? How do we know who actually "won" the election? Does it matter if the defense of the nation was at stake? Maybe Trump was promised that he was going to be president no matter what, and that is role would be played out exactly as it has unfolded.

I do not think one can make the claim that is is just fanciful thinking. We do know that the Brits didn't reveal they had broken Nazi codes (Ultra) until the mid-70s; 30 years after the war. Long established histories had to be revised/re-written to reflect the long suppressed truth. I don't think there's any reason why similar situations couldn't exist with respect to many key events that have taken place over the last few decades.

Great stuff thanks very much for posting all this.

Ransomnote: Regarding your post #4, reproduced below for your convenience, which now appears to be a recurring part of your header postings for each new Qanon thread I have a few questions:

General Quesitons about the Source

You took this image off or reddit where it is claimed to be "A breakdown of Deep State antics and how we countered them by the mysterious 8ch Anon". Did you investigate the original posting on 8chan?
Do you know what else this Anon has posted? Do you feel he is credible?
By listing it at the top of the thread you are implicitly giving some credibility to it. Do you feel this meme accurately reflects Q's claims, not just Anon speculation?
If so, why? It appears to me that many of the claims made in this post are not related to any particular Q post, but are either old conspiracy theory topics recycled, or brand new theories of the anonymous creator of this meme. Specifically:
Frame #1: Nothing Here to See (voting is useless)
Here 8chan anon suggests that voting is pointless ("if your votes really mattered, you would never be allowed to vote") he goes on to reprise a mish-mash of discredited conspiracy theories:
Just for fun let's look at 9/11 timelines:
July 16, 1999 - JFK Jr. dies in plane crash
Sept 3, 1999 - HRC buys house in New York
Feb 7, 1999 - HRC runs for Senate (D-NY)
Nov 8, 2000 - Bush elected President (R)
Sept 11, 2001 - Twin Towers attack in NYC
Oct 26, 2001 - Patriot Act becomes law
(They) create a problem to get more control.
(They) were selected, not elected.
(They) have been in control for millenia
(They) are pure EVIL.
Do you believe that 9/11 was a faked event that elements of the US Government were actually involved in?
I looked into the alternate explanations for 9/11 very carefully at the time and for years later, and like almost every other person I know who did this, concluded that the standard and obvious explanation is the correct one. Muslim terrorists, organized by Osama Bin Laden and masterminded by Omar Sheik Mohammed planned and pulled off the terrorist strike.
I've found that the people who argue otherwise are often Leftist nutjobs, for instance the makers of the infamous "Spare Change" video. In general Free Republic has never really supported being a platform for insane conspiracy theories, like the CIA/Mossad/Rothchilds blew up the Twin Towers, so I'm sort of surprised to see it popping up on every new thread as part of the official introduction.
Do you feel that President's Bush, Clinton, Bush II and Obama were "selected not elected" as the 8chan anon suggests?
Again, the term "selected not elected" is not a new one, it was the chant of the unhinged left to the close election victory of George W. Bush over Al Gore in 2000. It has a disgusting pedigree of being used by the worst Leftists in an endless attempt to discredit Bush, which is similar to the current attempt to discredit Trump.
At minimum it is a very strange tag line for a supposedly pro-Trump and pro-GOP posting.
Do you feel president George H.W. Bush was "selected" in his election in 1988? Why?
Do you feel that president George W. Bush was "selected" in his election in 2000? Do you believe that Al Gore was the legitimate winner?
What do you mean exactly by claiming that all our elections going back to Reagan-era have been rigged?
Do you acknowledge the danger in promoting anonymous memes from 8chan that claim that all our elections are rigged, especially in the run up to a crucial election where Republican turnout is likely to be critical to the GOP holding the House and Trump avoiding impeachment?
What are you doing to mitigate this problem (of playing into Democratic hands by convincing Freepers that all the elections are rigged)?
Are you aware of any evidence to support the theory that JFK Jr. and his passengers were murdered, as the meme suggests, to clear the path for Hillary to run for the Senate in NY, as the meme clearly suggests?

I'm always very careful in my Q analysis to try to separate out what Q has said (much of which is cryptic and phrased as questions) and what his many interpreters claim it means.

So, in regards to these points above, as well at the many other assertions made in this graphic do you feel that they are based on Q's drops, or are the embellishments or additions?

They sure look like embellishments to me.

There are many other very questionable bits of content from this one meme. Again my dual questions are always:

A) Is there any real evidence to support this claim, or is it just recycled nonsense AND
B) Did Q really make this claim or is it a pet theory of some anonymous Anime fan on 8chan?

Frame #2 Election Rigging:

A problem with Q's style "what if?" is that him imitators have taken to using it as a dodge to stating specifics and backing them up with facts.
In Wayne Co. Michigan (Detroit) Hillary won over 75% of the vote, and Trump had only 76,000 votes cast for him. Did the "unfixing" involve (as the poster claims) allowing 25% of people in Detroit to have their Trump votes counted? If so why are the percents so similar to the previous elections results in Wayne Co. (when the NSA presumably did not use their powers to unfix the votes).
For instance Obama got 74% of the vote in 2008 in Wayne County.
Put simply there is zero evidence to support the claim made in your meme from actual facts and figures I have examined.
I think magical powers are being asserted to the NSA here, votes in Wayne County are done much like elsewhere in the USA in a very distributed manner, precinct by precinct. If cheating is occurring it's probably happening using the tried and true Democratic techniques of "vote stuffing" using dead voters, fake voters and multiple voters at individual precincts.
FRAME #3: Obama's secret pardons
I doubt this is possible, frankly. Much less that it happened. It seems extremely far fetched. Again, no evidence is presented to support this claim, but now the entire Q thread is infected with people talking like we know this happened.
Has Q every mentioned "Secret Pardons"?
I investigated the sub-claim that the President can not pardon military crimes. It is incorrect.
I did a small bit of research and found this:

A Presidential Pardon for Military offenses has a separate process. A petitioner applying for executive clemency with respect to military offenses should submit his or her petition directly to the Secretary of the military department that had original jurisdiction over the court-martial trial and conviction of the petitioner. In such a case, a form furnished by the Pardon Attorney may be used but should be modified to meet the needs of the particular case. Each petition for executive clemency should include the information required in the form prescribed by the Attorney General.

Given that there is a formal process for applying for one I think the 8chan anon's claims are obviously incorrect. Why should I believe the other extraordinary claims he makes on this (or other) topics.
Q makes it a big point that we are supposed to do our own research. OK, there's some.
FRAME #4: Military Tribunals.
I did a couple long postings on this about three weeks ago, went and dug out the existing laws on it. This set of claims doesn't seem backed up by any actual knowledge of those laws.
Again: the incorrect claim is made that Presidential Pardons do not cover military crimes. In fact, they do.
The U.S. Constitution lays out the Presidential Pardon power, so it's not like it's hard to find the law on this. In fact, the same section of the Constitution that gives him the power of commander of the armed forces also establishes his pardon power, which only excludes impeachments.

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

SUMMARY
I have put together this detailed response to your meme on Post #4, but I've only covered the first 1/2 of what is claimed there.
Perhaps, if I'm feeling motivated, I'll go through the Frames #5 - #8, but I think the validity of this meme has already been discredited.

People on this thread who have posted links to 8chan recently have been policed by others on thread for violating Free Republic's posting rules, which is good. We all have to work to keep this place great.
But here's the thing. It's not that the only thing that is problematic about 8chan are direct links to it, much of the 8chan content itself is problematic.
Jim's been able to build up a world-class site in part because he's never let the crazies fill page after page of the site with their pet theories.
Now, somehow, because there is some claimed connection to Q, it seems like every conspiracy theorist on the planet has been given a new lease-on-life, and worse, a friendly home here at Free Republic, if they claim it has something to do with Q and dress it up in a fancy graphic.
I'm not sure what the answer is, but some part of it has to be that the people leading the thread, like you, take more care in really considering what it is that you are promoting.
Thanks for taking time to consider my issues with this meme.
PS: Who is (they) referred to in the 8chan meme? This seems like it might be a watered down form of the anti-Semitic (((they))). It's hard to read 8chan because of the sickening and retarded anti-Semitism that fills every thread, including the Qanon threads. I'd hate to see that start showing up over here.