Posted on 09/01/2018 9:49:15 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q seems to place importance on them so it is no surprise you don't and conclude that there is Not enough information to draw any useful conclusions from it.
Knock me over with a feather JB is anti-Q.
Debunking the claims about 40,000 sealed indictments">
This seems pretty well researched and explained, which is where my skepticism comes from.
The fact that the process being used ensure the number will only go up and up (like total of all home runs hit in the Major League at the end of each month) means I can't get real excited that "the number has gone up".
it IS an unusually large amount historically but I’m reserving judgement until the SHTF.
Here’s something that I noticed....
In Q’s first 100 posts, he mention satan/satanism a lot. Then it tapered off for the next few hundred, then nothing about it until 1002, then nothing until today. (Unless I missed one somewhere.)
In today’s post, he doesn’t directly spell it out; he just refers to a meme put up by another anon.
So I am wondering if Q started out going after the satanism, but he found by monitoring responses that that topic was too far “out there” for people to cope with, i.e, too extreme to even be believable. So then maybe he adjusted the plan to attack things that people could more easily wrap their head around. He focused on concrete things like the FISA warrants, MSM corruption, etc. Perhaps now there are enough of us on board to know what’s going on that he’s venturing out into spiritual issues once again.
One more point: It’s so obvious that the trolling works. If Trump is for it, then the DS is against. It works in reverse, too. See my post 1339. I don’t really know much about Kavanaugh, but I’m inclined to support him because Trump does and because the DS doesn’t.
Tell us the real reason, Jack.
#HonestyIsTheBestPolicy
Bagster
But Jack Bot, you don’t get excited about anything. That’s kind of central to the whole buzzkill schtick you do. I always read your posts in an Eeyore voice. It works well.
Its all for naught.
Over time they have become much longer, and the individual lines are longer and less enigmatic. Also the early posts didn't have a lot of links in them, the occassional picture though. Now we've had posts with dozens of links.
Assuming that Q is a program, not a single person, but a small ground might explain this. Maybe one person started the posts, and others have picked it up now, or they have decided to evolve them.
I am not trying to derive anything other the sheer number of sealed court action.
I have no idea what they are and who they involve, just the numbers are impressive.
The question should be, why wouldn’t Ramen Noodle ballerina be indicted?
Said all along thru the year running for third term. Raised $10 million. Suddenly stops. Talk of future successor? Nope. Not how power structure works there.
The mofo was chief of staff of the White House for Clintons and Obozo. Involved in Fast and Furious Scandal. He’s complicit. The faggot’s going down.
Too bad there is no “ignore” button on FreeRepublic. Several on this thread including their BS posts would easily go away.
That sounds promising.
Thank you.
If you are paid, ok, shitty but ok. If you are here to save us from Q, thanks but no. Make my own decisions.
Good one!
Because mac is a front hole who only shows up on any thread to be a jerk.
Good points.
As for your:
I dont really know much about Kavanaugh, but Im inclined to support him because Trump does and because the DS doesnt.
,,,
I say, “Ditto!”
That'a nice piece of work, though, and someone really dug in to go figure some stuff out.
Thank you.
Gee, they couldn't find a Muslim, black Gold Star mother who also had a handicapped lesbian daughter killed at Parkland to do this drive-by?
They are slipping up.
The person who wrote that thinks that speeding tickets are handled in federal district courts. Sorry. Was the author economic degree Occassional-Cortex?
I tried multiple times to send out an Kavanaugh alert to people on my email list. All returned with
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
554 5.7.1 We were unable to deliver your message. Please try resending your message by adding some text
Added some text, still got the same message. Is my message being blocked by AOL?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.