[JockoManning]

What are your informed guesses about the 'much greater scandal?" It seems to me that there are a limited number of likely possibilities. And the odds are that the better informed among us have come across at least some hints of such--but perhaps not.

[StormFlag]

What are your informed guesses about the 'much greater scandal?" It seems to me that there are a limited number of likely possibilities. And the odds are that the better informed among us have come across at least some hints of such--but perhaps not.

~~~~~ Here is what I'm hoping for...

1. 4th FISA has RR signature, which ties his approval to it for good or bad 2. It again appears that the Dossier was the primary evidence

This last is really iffy

3. Would it include anything (however unspecific) about the other paid informants? Including the date they actually began the investigation?...

[EasySt]

If I may,

I think Q’s post #1708 speaks to the “much greater scandal” in question.

And if [RR] is following his oath there may be something in those 20 pages in the FISA he signed that opens the window into this:

Q #1708:

What if the UK gov worked hand-in-hand w/ the Hussein admin to sabotage the 2016 election?
Data collection.
Voice.
Video.
Bugging.
Creation of fake intel dossier using ex spy.
Co-sponsor insurance policy re: POTUS election.
PS.
LP.
No Name.
Clapper.
Brennan.
Rice.
LL.
HRC.
BC.
Hussein.
+22
What if intel masked penetration(s) to frame Russia?
Crowdstrike?
Servers.
SR.
JA.
Why does the UK gov desperately want JA?
Think source files.
The more you know.
Q