I thought this was a good take from an anon:
Clearly, the wave of Q bashing is coordinated at a level above the individual media outlets and pundits. The consistency of both headlines, content, and assessment prove this beyond any doubt. Any outlet participating in the anti-Q campaign has outed themselves, and I’m certain that many regulars here could have predicted who would have joined the MSM from the ranks of the supposed “alt-media.” Some of them were following orders long before now.
If Q is all nonsense, believed only by a class of basement dwelling, marginally sane, uneducated, cult-susceptible morons, as all the bandwagon jumpers so vigorously assert, then why bother to attack in such a coordinated manner? Are we going to see the same pack-attack on flat earthers, NASA skeptics, etc, etc?
I doubt it, because those beliefs (whether founded or not) don’t upset the establishment gravy train.
The virulence of this week’s onslaught on the Q phenomenon tells us all we need to know: Q is viewed as a clear and present danger to the establishment by its highest levels. Of course, the MSM and fellow travelers will argue that we are a threat to national security and public order, but that’s only because that’s the line they’ve been directed to adopt. None of them knows enough to have analyzed this movement, its values or its objectives, and the cry of violent extremism has not one scintilla of evidence in its support.
But this is how all threats to the status quo are branded, whether they be the civil rights movement, patriot militias, or the Tea Party. The anti-Q initiative is straight out of a well-worn playbook. The participants in the attack might have changed and diversified, but the orchestrators have not.
Those who ally themselves with this propaganda campaign are showing themselves for what they are: conformists to establishment privilege, doctrine, and propaganda methods. This is a strategy of de-legitimation and containment. I suspect that the anti-Q reaction has come too late to achieve its goals, as the traction achieved without fanfare is now beyond the ability of mere propaganda to extinguish.
We are in the firing line, but Truth is a mighty weapon. We must hold fast, Patriots.
and, imho, conformists to satan's goals and means.
Thanks for that, Jocko.
Here’s another Anon’s take, this one on conspiracy theories...
A rebuttal to the term “conspiracy theory”
There was palace intrigue long before the countries of Europe as we know them today or The United States of America was formed.
Struggles for power, both behind the scenes and in public are real and have solid historical record.
Those Senators didn’t all wake up on 15 March and converge, out of the blue, draw their knives and stab Caesar to death on a whim, with no coordination whatsoever.
Many princes murdered brothers and other relatives in order to be the one who ascended to the throne.
Coup d’etats are real, so are counter-coups.
Conspiracies take different forms - some fore mere financial gain, some for increase of power. For anyone to state or imply that conspiracies do not exist, displays the height of mendacity and dissembling.
A great many court criminal cases are won due to circumstantial evidence, not a smoking gun, as it were. Intelligence analysts are given data, they then sift through that data to see if there are connections between data points, patterns in activities or behaviors. They collate this in a coherent form and present it to their superiors in a report.
That is exactly what the citizen-researchers at /qresearch/ do:
-research a person, date, activity, business, location
-gather the results of the research and present them here
-sort through that data to decide what, if anything, is relevant
-determine if there are connections between relevant data points
It is a process, just like what intelligence analysts do. Are they always correct? If they are missing relevant data or if they begin with a faulty premise, then no. The same goes for anyone, not just the citizen-researchers on /qresearch/ or the 23 intelligence agencies of our government.
We seek Truth. We go where the data trail takes us, no matter how strange, disturbing or obscure.
We have no leader, no boss, no superior to set parameters of acceptable topics or limit our investigation into any one, anything, any place, etc.. We have the largest open-source research project powered by the largest amount of researchers and analysts in the history of the world, and it’s being done for free, with no hope of recognition, praise, or personal gain.
The only people who would balk at this effort are those who are afraid of what the millions of anons worldwide will find.
Let that sink in for a moment.
I do not at all mind being called a “conspiracy theorist” as long as it is understood that I will label others as “coincidence theorists.”