Posted on 08/01/2018 6:57:15 PM PDT by FrdmLvr
Qanon has said that they were put in custody within minutes or a very short time. That is our only source.
Very possible that we knew what was to happen and had some very big dudes with bad attitudes prepositioned for the take down.
Qanon referenced a D5 launch directly rather than an AGM-88 launch. I was not aware of the AGM-88 capability until you asked and I confirmed. Thanks for the question, learned something new.
Take a look at this article before making up your mind.
Let's Talk About That Mysterious 'Rocket Launch Over Whidbey Island' Photo (Updated)
I’ve seen the photos. I think I understand the story. Something went off. It was no ICBM. And subs dont usually carry smaller missiles like that.
I’ve also seen what a large rocket looks like and sounds like. THATis not a rocket you would use to shoot down a plane.
That is what I am basing it on.
Did I miss something (honest...no trying to be a jerk.)
Read the article...there was a rescue helicopter taking off at the exact time and location as the “missile” launch.
There was also an Alaska Airlines flight in the vicinity making an approach to land at Sea-Tac.
Two credible, and independent sources who were in the area and saw absolutely nothing being launched as they themselves were navigating the pre-dawn skies above Whidbey Island.
1. The attempt during the rally was on TV and live.
2. A nature camera caught a missile launch off of Washington state shortly after POTUS plane passed. Missile launch was said to have never happened by the press and military. June 10-12, the information is still online.
3. The CNN van was reported in the news, but not as an attempt.
100% false...and a good reason why no one should take this Q nonsense seriously.
You folks literally just make chit up and post it.
Sorry mac you are dead wrong.....
No buddy, I’m not.
Read the article linked at #63 and my comments at #65.
ave you viewed the real picture? It is not a helicopter
FYI, aspect ratio of the AGM-88 is >16. If the D5 is skinny, the HARM is more than twice as skinny.
“D5” appears in several Q posts but the context doesn’t seem to match the missile. If you have a specific post in mind please give the number. Thanks
Also keep in mind that when it comes to technical details, misinformation is often required. The whole world can see Q.
In any case, the missile in the Skunk Bay photo is clearly not a D5. The aspect ratio doesn’t match, the mission profile doesn’t match, and the lack of smoke doesn’t match (but does match the smokeless flight motor on the HARM).
The bright trail in the photo is a function of the shutter being open while the missile covered that distance. It’s not smoke, notice the lack of dispersion.
Besides which there are two competent independent eye witnesses, the chopper pilot and the Alaska pilot who are verified to be at that location or in the immediate vicinity who saw nothing.
It didn't happen...nor was AF1 anywhere close by
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.