Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: canuck_conservative
Statistical tricks were constantly used, like the “low” unemployment rate during Obozo’s term.

I never heard mention of these "U" numbers prior to Obama. The unemployment rate was the unemployment rate. Under dumbass's rule, they had to parse them out to make them sound better.

With that alone, all other Obama stats should be taken with a tiny grain of salt...

6 posted on 07/28/2018 4:08:22 AM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Magnatron

Actually that’s not true—different unemployment rates before Barry. He just put lots of his unemployed on the permanent dole via “disability”.

Also, obviously had the GDP growth number artificially goosed for the 2014 election.


21 posted on 07/28/2018 4:43:37 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Magnatron

The various “U” numbers are long standing, and constantly discussed. If you were following the business and economics journals you would have heard of them long ago.

IIRC they were a big deal back in the 70’s, when I started reading the WSJ, the Economist, Fortune, etc. religiously.


36 posted on 07/28/2018 6:13:01 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson