Replies

I tried reading SerialBrain2 on Reddit but sadly, the content I read there caused me to reject their input initially. For example, I doubt SB2’s assertion that Putin tossed the soccer ball to Trump because a soccer team has 11 players and Putin was indicating that if 12 Russians are needed, Putin would be the 12th. I see that many SB2 followers find value in the posts so it’s either my limitation or the natural progression from raw outside-the-box thinking to greater refinement later. Also on Reddit, I watched SB2’s video (no audio) text presentation of an interaction with an Anon in which I felt SB2 was simply toying with the Anon (e.g., “Grasshopper” treatment) when I don’t want to spend time decoding the decoders (that vid never answered its own toying questions). At that point I resolved to ignore SB2, even though Q did single out one of his links in a Q drop earlier.

Note that SB2 is currently asserting that Trump is signaling that he wants SB2 to continue exposing info along the same line’s he’s been presenting. I had no interest in the reasoning there, I confess.

However, I continue to encounter others I respect whom reference SB2 and I am wondering if it is because, aside from my own limitations/preferences, when SB2 is right, SB2 is UNIQUELY right. So I definitely turn to “sift-mode” as I review SB2’s work. I think one can find gems in there and I believe those gems result from SB2’s greater departure from conventional thinking than I’ve encountered elsewhere. This isn’t conventional warfare on a conceivable scale; there is no precedent and for this reason, I continue to explore SB2 content.

I prefer to review Youtube vloggers who review (and revere?) SB2’s work. The first I watched was from WarDrummer, whom others recommend. In that one, SB2’s decode has some interesting things to say about the way Trump prepared to meet with Putin:
-Trump showed Putin that he could raise billions in defense funds (NATO) in a few hours just by asking. The message was “I can raise billions in defense funding without spending my own money.”
-Trump was shown (in an intriguing video clip I hadn’t seen) meeting with German leaders, telling them that the head of the gas company re Putin’s pipeline is the former Chancellor of Germany. SB2 asserts that Trump “just told the world” about this connection and signaled Putin, “I can intervene in the pipeline.”
-I forget the 3rd point, might have been NK.
So SB2 said these meetings were object lessons that put Trump and Putin on the same page before they met.

But I digress. The title of the content you requested is in WarDrummer’s youtube video “The real reason Trump modified his answer about the Intelligence Community & Russia By SerialBrain2” and here is the link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHqseaogGOc&t=122s

I think I could listen to WarDrummer’s trade-mark military drumming music all day, I think I’d get much more done. Check the 2:00 minute mark for a sample.

SB2 has always been interesting. His idea on how to decipher Trump tweets that have errors in them is/was interesting ... but it's not consistent; sometimes it kinda works, the rest it never does. He no longer even "deciphers" them because he did that before - I have a couple times using his method (posted here before) and, again, sometimes kinda works, most doesn't.

So ... then he got h/t from "Q" and since then it's been deep down into the weeds. They're often wildly convoluted inferences combined with a certain arrogance in presentation that I usually often times lacking. But it's always an interesting read and there are always things to pick up on along the way.

Soccer ball - take at face value, the symbolism of Putin giving to Trump and saying, "the ball's in your court". What more does one need to infer? lol That said, it is/was one of those that has an embedded microprocessor and it might well have had other purposes. The normal protocol for such things is to send to the lab and then to holding for archives, etc. - that specific particular ball was never going to make it to Baron (seriously? no. lol) Of course it was treated like a trojan horse. IMO ;)

So I definitely turn to “sift-mode” as I review SB2’s work.

That's the only mode to be in.

NOBODY is right 188% of the time (other than me).

It's best we use our own common sense to suss truth from non-truth, maybe true from maybe not true, probably true from probably not true. And all the shades of truthful information out there. And there's a lot.

p.s. Serial brain tried to say that Alawadi was sending a message on a video with a mug which was to be interpreted as "I'm being mugged" which Q was telling us about with the "mugholder" in the AF-1 photos. As if Ayrabs even use the term "mugged" in that context. Hello.

So yea. The dude can be WAY out in left field, and yet he can nail it. Just like anybody else.

As the tattoos say, "Trust no man." They also say "FTW" a lot. Convicts have a certain base wisdom, eh?

Bagster