Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62

From the article :

But our analyses show that these genes are also found in animals that do not have a nervous system, such as sponges. That means the genetic basis of the nervous system may have evolved before the nervous system itself did.

Not possible under strict evolution. The body would not evolve something for which it had no use.


13 posted on 07/14/2018 8:50:43 AM PDT by Terabitten (Time for the GOPe to reap the whirlwind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Terabitten

But our analyses show that these genes are also found in animals that do not have a nervous system, such as sponges. That means the genetic basis of the nervous system may have evolved before the nervous system itself did.

Not possible under strict evolution. The body would not evolve something for which it had no use.

...

The genes had a purpose in the other organisms, just not for the nervous system.


17 posted on 07/14/2018 9:12:01 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Terabitten

The body would not evolve something for which it had no use.


Not an keep it.

That observation just means it had a use for the genomes prior to being put to that use. We see the same thing occurring today in species which use the same or very similar proteins for differing uses - in some cases for differing uses in different tissues within the same organism.


25 posted on 07/14/2018 9:53:09 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson