Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fso301

Did they mean RAP (Rocket Assisted Projectile) round? I don’t think a RAM-jet is feasible for artillery.


16 posted on 06/14/2018 2:00:04 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: SJSAMPLE

“Did they mean RAP (Rocket Assisted Projectile) round? I don’t think a RAM-jet is feasible for artillery.”

Hybrid systems - part rocket, part ramjet - have been in routine use for decades in guided missile systems. Auxiliary pure rockets boost the missile airframe to an airspeed high enough to keep the ramjet operating; then it takes over and powers the missile airframe the rest of the way to the target.

The advantages of a ramjet over a gas-turbine jet are simplicity, cost, and weight; the disadvantages are that a fairly constant speed must be maintained; so a ramjet cannot operate in as many different flight regimes as a turbojet.

One advantage of a ramjet over a pure rocket is smaller size/weight for a given payload, speed, and range; the ramjet uses external air and does not need to tote its own oxidizer. One disadvantage: external air supply is crucial. Rockets do tote their own oxidizer and don’t need air to operate.

A question not brought up in the article: can a ramjet be fitted into a projectile small enough to be fired from a gun barrel? Turbojets are made small enough these days, to fit into radio-controlled model aircraft; perhaps ramjets can be downsized the same way.

SJSAMPLE is quite right to be concerned about feasibility.


21 posted on 06/14/2018 6:24:09 PM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson