Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

A healthy skepticism with respect to Q is not a bad thing. I think even Q would tell you the number one rule of intel analysis:

“Never fall in love with your source”

You have to be a goldfish - yesterday’s intel was great, we loved it, it was correct, and timely.

What do you have for us today? You’re record is now 0 - 0.

I think Q is legit. I think what they are doing is historic and world changing. No way its a LARP.

I pray they keep doing it, and I pray they are actually on our side.

At this point, I trust nobody, but I’m supremely optimistic for the first time in my life.


666 posted on 05/16/2018 9:40:10 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies ]


To: RinaseaofDs
A healthy skepticism with respect to Q is not a bad thing. I think even Q would tell you the number one rule of intel analysis:

Concur. I love the information, not the source. Though if Q is who I believe him (them) to be, then they are American heroes. Healthy skepticism is one thing, but a constant grind to debunk the "source" and thereby the information is not our purpose. We all (I hope) act under the assumption that the Q team is a sanctioned Presidential operation and that assumption elevates the message in validity and importance.

To debunk Q is to debunk the info.

I have strong opinions. Everybody feel free to attack and bully me. (comment not directed at you, R.) Hahaha.

790 posted on 05/16/2018 11:22:07 AM PDT by bagster (The Bagster Alliance is insidous. The B clique is mighty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson