[Kalam]

The updates you post are a good thing bagster. Life has those ‘crazy times’ and one sometimes misses something just skimming to play catch up.

On your next update I hope you could add Q’s confirmation point regarding AG Sessions.
Q wrote,”Would SESSIONS be AG (still) if DEEP STATE?
Critical thinking dismisses fictional clickbait claims.

I understand the form of theses sentences is a bit tough. But to try and make the statement mean anything other than a huge confirmation is nye impossible. This post by Q is exactly the first point I and others have purpoted in AG Sessions defense for a long, long time. So the validation by Q is a happy moment in this struggle. Thanks

[bagster]

I hear ya, Kalam. Q has been saying "Trust Sessions" for a long time now. This is the first time (I think) he has straightforwardly come out and explained why in a bit more detail (kinda). The Oracle understands the controversy behind A.G. Sessions and is with Q in trusting Sessions. You are right to reemphasis this point.

Keep in mind that the Oracle tries to add a bit of interpretation to Q's posts (if it can) rather than just retyping them, while giving updates. Stay in the Sessions car. It is another car (like Q) in the Trump train. ThankQ for your commentary, goodman. :)

Bagster

Lesser Oracle

Bagster