Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62
It’s a lot safer than the Shuttle.

The original shuttle design had pyrotechnics to separate the crew compartment from the bulk of the orbiter and parachute it safely to earth.

NASA management elected to remove the pyrotechnics and the parachutes.

In the challenger disaster, the crew compartment separated at the designed-in parting line, and the still living crew plummeted without the benefit of parachutes to a very hard impact with the ocean.

12 posted on 05/06/2018 2:05:58 PM PDT by null and void (Urban "food deserts," are caused by urban customers' "climate change" (H/T niteowl77))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: null and void
...still living crew

I have heard about that. That's horrific and absolutely typical government idiocy to not have a safety escape system.

13 posted on 05/06/2018 2:24:42 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

I think they did have ejection seats for the first couple of flights. For the first launch the body flap was bent back beyond design limits from the pressure wave of the solid rockets igniting. John Young said if he would have known what happened at the time, he would have ordered an ejection. Such a mishap should have made the Orbiter uncontrollable on reentry, but obviously they made it.

Had management taken the Columbia foam impact seriously, Shuttle Atlantis was already on the launch pad and could have done a rescue.


14 posted on 05/06/2018 2:26:41 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson