Hmmm...you are right, I cannot prove John Podesta has NOT been arrested, etc. Likewise, you have zero proof he HAS been arrested, etc. So using your logic, prove it, or your blowing smoke.
OK, let me put it this way: people who believe the Q stuff that Podesta has been arrested, gitmo renditions, “Trust Rosenstein!”etc, are idiots. That’s my opinion. And I see from your posting history, you’re one of the Qooks here. Soo...if the shoe fits...
“Hmmm...you are right, I cannot prove John Podesta has NOT been arrested, etc. Likewise, you have zero proof he HAS been arrested, etc. So using your logic, prove it, or your blowing smoke.”
No. I’ve made no truth claims. You did. I asked for your evidence that proves your claim. To your credit, you admit you do not have proof.
“people who believe the Q stuff that Podesta has been arrested, gitmo renditions, “Trust Rosenstein!”etc, are idiots. That’s my opinion. And I see from your posting history, you’re one of the Qooks here”
No. Again. I have no idea if Q is who he says. I don’t try to claim I know he is or is not. Until it is demonstrated with proof, I’m on the edge of the coin. I am paying attention because of what I’ve read and subsequent events. For all I know Podesta has been arrested...
That you’ve no proof for your truth claim and your immediate resort to ad hominem characterizations instead of facts or evidence, indicates you only have opinions. No problem with opinions. We all have those.
In the mean time, I’ve read enough to lean toward Q being Admiral Mike Rogers or someone else with a military intelligence background. Time will tell. In the meantime, I welcome whoever it is as an ally of Trump.