Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gaijin
Well, "Romans" depending on the period of history were not exclusively white (except during the early Republican era) - from the time of Marius onwards they did have admixture with Berber peoples and by the time of the Severan dynasty were merged with Semitic peoples.

they weren't aub-Saharan African in general but there were doubtless some citizens from Caracalla's time onwards who had some sub-saharan African blood and even East Asian blood

The black and white dichtomy is daft, the Romans only cared if you were a citizen or not.

19 posted on 03/21/2018 1:49:58 AM PDT by Cronos (Obama's dislike of Assad is not based on his brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos
"The black and white dichtomy is daft, the Romans only cared if you were a citizen or not."

I've read reports that first the Greeks and later the Romans made trips to the Canary Islands to obtain slaves there because the had a Nordic appearance, tall, blonde and White and they were the preferred sex slave.

21 posted on 03/21/2018 10:25:43 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson