There's an easy way to avoid being called a Holocaust denier—don't deny the Holocaust.
Q needs to focus on the here and now, and not dredge up controversial/outlandish takes on history, such as who is related to whom.
Angela Merkel is the current Chancellor of Germany, and who she's related to is irrelevant—or should be. She is to be judged on her own qualities and beliefs as an individual. Who cares who she's related to?
On another note, am I to take it that some here are accepting as an absolute fact that Justice Scalia was murdered? I've seen no evidence of that, and nobody gets the benefit of the doubt to have it accepted as truth for merely suggesting it.
Same goes for the child sacrifice/HRC is a pedophile stuff. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
I don't know how much of this stuff has been directly asserted by Q and how much is just others' filling in the blanks, but IMHO, we need to focus on facts, and what can be confirmed. At the moment, I remain unconvinced that Q has any superior standing as an arbiter of truth. I'm intrigued, but also skeptical and cautious, because sometimes I'm seeing "words being put into Q's mouth", so to speak.
I confess that I haven't been privy to every Q post or every Q thread on FR.
One thing I know for sure, though, is that if Q veers into "third rails" such as anti-Semitism or holocaust denial, then he'll discredit himself and lose me altogether. Citing individual Jewish elites such as the Rothschilds as powerful and threatening is one thing, but broad-brushing is quite another.
It also is the case that Q may being interspersing his own opinion with some facts. Caution is advised, and skepticism is warranted, so while I hate trolls as much as the next person, I hope that these threads can still include a healthy level of critical analysis.
Just my stream-of-consciousness 2 cents' worth regarding a phenomenon I haven't drawn a definitive conclusion on as yet...
Of course, you will concede that neither Q or anybody else has suggested in any way shape or form any opinions that could be construed as "anti-semetic" or "denying the holocaust."
Just for the record.
That’s what I’m saying. The holocaust is quite obviously 100% real but deep state will shut you down with the ‘denyer’ label if you question any aspect of their account of HOW it happened, and by exactly WHO.
Wells said, sargon.
The Nazi/Catholic Church/Jew posts in 8Chan this weekend were distracting.
I also agree with you regarding using a broad brush.
I am interested to see what Q will post next just to see if he ‘pulls back’ from this conversation all together.
One thing I did consider was Tillerson’s trip to Kenya last week. First he had to cancel some events because he was not feeling well. Now he is headed back, cutting the trip short. A ‘pull back’?
I see that as one of the biggest problems that has hindered the effort, and if it continues, it will become worse.
Especially in how expectations are being set for events that may or may not happen, on a given date, or ever.
Recently we have seen swarms of momentum built up about a particular type of video (or another particular type of video) being released yesterday (3/11) or perhaps on 3/15.
Of course a lot of this is to be expected within a model in which information and data is given out (largely) in the form of clues that people are encouraged to research and put together. However, without applying strict discipline to the effort, it is inevitable that the "answers" being peddled all over the Internet are going to be far afield (and often damaging to the original intent).
As we all can see, people all over the Internet are quickly posting their latest theories and conclusions 24 hours each day. Some of them are well meaning in their motivation, some are not. Some are striving to maintain a level of discipline and let their conclusions be guided by where the clues and research lead them, and some are using this exercise to mold the conclusions to support their pet theories and beliefs.
Of course we can't control what is being created out on all reaches of the Internet, but we can control the quality and tenor of the FR "Q" threads. I have seen some really fantastic posts in these threads based on FReepers examining the actual content and context of various Q posts, and putting forth some well reasoned opinions on the possible meaning(s) of the posts. Others provide detailed analysis of video or images and tether them to other data points of information; these are fantastic work efforts that should be relished!
But I have also seen wild 'copy and pastes' of anonymous individuals' wild unsubstantiated guesses about things. There are links to blithering idiots on you tube rambling incoherently about things that they have no real clue about.
All that I am saying is that the more we (in these FR Q threads) stick to the actual content and context of the Q posts, while bringing in data and information that is verified (at least to the point of the source being validated as a real human being or entity), the better quality our research will be (and we will be less guilty of setting expectations for others that are merely warm desires).
And when we introduce content from "the wild" it may help if we include our own comments regarding what we know (or don't know) of the source, supporting data/information, and its relationship to the larger picture.
Just my two cents, I'd had to see this effort dashed upon the rocks by a constant stream of wishful thinking that never comes to pass.
He will lose me too if he embraces the views of the Holocaust deniers. Shortly after his Israel post, He posted w video BY an admiral who is very pro survival of the state of Israel. I think (hope) Q saw where this was heading and that is how he tried to pull back.
There is no evidence Merkel is related to Hitler. And the anti-Semitism that overtook the 8ch board this weekend was about more than I could stand. Study the history of Jewish persecution folks! We do NOT want to be those people!!!!
Israel is our friend and God’s protectorate. We need to get this one right.