This is the same sort of tactic used by the SJW's.
Molyneux may say controversial things (and a lot of very very stupid things) but he is not a neo-Nazi or skinhead (although he is mostly bald).
Peterson should meet and discuss with whomever he wants. He should get his message out as much as possible.
This whole guilt by association act is just a way to marginalize entire swaths of conservatives and moderate liberals and prevent them from engaging in meaningful debate.
Dr. Jordan Peterson was on Glenn Beck this morning discussing his book.
He had a video with PragerU this week.
Glad to see his book has actually sold out at number one on Amazon.
Marcus’ immediately does the same thing that SJWs always do, accept a dumb premise and run from there. Peterson does not accept the very premise of “White Privilege” and so Marcus is setting up a straw man argument to point out errors where none exists. He would do well to actually listen to what Peterson has to say rather than putting his interpretation of what Peterson says in the article.
I forgot to hit excerpt and had no idea if the whole article could be posted or not. (I live in fear of the Admin Monitors...).
“Marcus criticizes Peterson’s online discussion with Molyneux..” -— Yep, that’s on my list of videos to watch.
I’m currently going through the one with Camile Pagellia. So far, it’s very interesting wrt Academia in the 60’s and 70s.