Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

” heartily wish I had because Q drop #15 dated October 31, 2017 (excerpted) has this to say:

11.3 - Podesta indicted
11.6 - Huma indicted “

Yep, one of his early failed predictions. Not sure why people keep believing he is credible when he failed so spectacularly so early on.


13 posted on 01/25/2018 10:07:45 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

A sealed indictment doesn’t mean arrested.


15 posted on 01/25/2018 10:09:04 AM PST by demsux (The "Mockingbirds" have come home to roost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

You have proof that they weren’t indicted? Please share your source. About 5 people all began sporting orthopedic boots at around the same time last fall: Hillary Clinton, Chelsea Clinto, Jackie Spier (spelling?) and one or two more. Many in the Q community believe this may be an attempt to hide ankle bracelets used to track those indicted but not arrested. A December 6 Q drop says Hillary tried to make a deal and was turned down.

It’s ironic that you sneer my information is false when it is literally impossible for you to have any evidence that what you assert is true.


19 posted on 01/25/2018 10:14:55 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

I believe ‘direct indictments’ come from grand juries in cases where the accused is not first arrested on a ‘felony complaint’. Anyone hear leaks from all those supposed grand juries that have indicted all of Hillary’s pals?


21 posted on 01/25/2018 10:17:59 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

How do you know they are not under sealed indictment? Share please.


30 posted on 01/25/2018 10:41:17 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

“Yep, one of his early failed predictions. Not sure why people keep believing he is credible when he failed so spectacularly so early on.”

Why do you say that? Nothing indicates that it isn’t true, and I saw a picture with Huma wearing bell bottom jeans that appeared to be covering a ome strange item near the ankle.


51 posted on 01/25/2018 2:56:15 PM PST by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman; ransomnote

” heartily wish I had because Q drop #15 dated October 31, 2017 (excerpted) has this to say:

11.3 - Podesta indicted
11.6 - Huma indicted “

Yep, one of his early failed predictions. Not sure why people keep believing he is credible when he failed so spectacularly so early on.


I wonder if we should think outside the box on this.
Help me remembe: didn’t Q mention something about the past being the future or something like that? I can’t find the post where I read it. Perhaps the 11-3 and 11-6 dates are 2018?

That’d be a long time to wait for an arrest though.


69 posted on 01/25/2018 4:22:54 PM PST by KittenClaws ( Normalcy Bias. Do you have it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson