You’ve seen no evidence.
On this we agree.
(To see evidence, you would need to take an honest look. That step is the missing ingredient.)
Your assertions about what is acceptable evidence etc. sounds like a Roman Catholic deeply awash in Maryolatry pretending to have a dialogue with a Pentecostal fiercely opposed to Maryolatry.
The RC awash in such is often intensely rigid, narrow, biased about what is acceptable evidence and consigns all who disagree as on a greased slide to hell.
That attitude comes across clearly in many of your postings in terms of what acceptable evidence is.
You are not some global or galactic Pontifical Supreme Court in charge of defining what is acceptable evidence--except for your own sensibilities--with all their flaws.
Dude. You claim to have looked at the Dec 14 drop and say you didn’t see the line about the seven guy meeting. You are either lying or dumber than you sound. I’m going with lying. so let’s not talk about evidence, shall we?