Posted on 01/23/2018 7:56:20 PM PST by ransomnote
Nov 14 2017 18:25:09
Q
!ITPb.qbhqo
ID: wmN+33xv
149467638
For the coming days ahead.
Ask yourself an honest question, why would a billionaire who has it all, fame, fortune, a warm and loving family, friends, etc. want to endanger himself and his family by becoming POTUS?
Why would he want to target himself and those he cares about?
Does he need money?
Does he need fame?
What does he get out of this?
Does he want to make the US/world a better place for his family and for those good and decent people who have long been taken advantage of?
Perhaps he could not stomach the thought of mass murders occurring to satisfy Moloch?
Perhaps he could not stomach the thought of children being kidnapped, drugged, and raped while leaders/law enforcement of the world turn a blind eye.
Perhaps he was tired of seeing how certain races/countries were being constantly abused and kept in need/poor/and suffering all for a specific purpose.
Perhaps he could not in good conscious see the world burn.
Why, hours after the election, did seven people travel to an undisclosed location to hold a very private & highly secured/guarded meeting?
Why didn’t HRC give a concession speech?
When was the last time a presidential candidate didn’t personally give a concession speech?
What happens if the border remained open and the MSM continued to brainwash?
At what point do Patriots, and hard working men and woman, become the minority?
What about voting machines?
Who owns the voting machines?
What about voter ID laws?
Photo ID? When is it necessary and must be presented? Make a list. Laugh.
Reconcile.
Would the chances of defeating evil grow less and less with each passing year?
What does ‘red line’ mean?
Why, again, were the arrests made in SA so very important?
What strings were immediately cut?
Follow the money.
When does a bird sing?
Q
:)Thanks,Thought I read it before.
The Clintons wouldn’t touch that with a 10 foot pole. She’d send lawyers with bags of money but she would maintain plausible deniability.
And in the morning.
I think the Q disciples need to learn to use a little Occam’s Razor.
When they are caged ???????
Birds also sing when their (dark)ening cover is removed and they are exposed to the (light of day).
They post on 8chan. It is compiled on github.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!
How, ransomnote, how? What is in that text that provides evidence that the information is true?
Why are you so sold on this guy?
Your comments only make sense, from a standpoint of deductive logic, if you first assume the larger premise is false.
The larger premise is that Q already has all the information. Meaning all of it.
“The noose made for Mordecai was used on Haman..(Book of Esther)”
Beautiful comparison. Love the Book of Esther. Thanks.
my bet is that the person posting is not Q himself but a cut out who has received instructions on what to post. I am guessing that this is a military cyber psyops operation from within government. I think he has approval from the white house. I am guessing that most of our intelligence agencies have been penetrated in the upper echelons with people loyal to other nation States and politically powerful private parties. so those involved in the release of this information are very secretive about it with in the agency.
“Why didn’t HRC give a concession speech?”
“When was the last time a presidential candidate didn’t?”
Hillary didn't give a concession speech because she was at the "very private & highly secured/guarded meeting".
Does the third question have an historical answer?
Was there a candidate who lost and didn't give a concession speech?
If so it would give us a clue as to the 'past revealing the future'.
I don't think that's so. I'll try to explain.
-- The larger premise is that Q already has all the information. Meaning all of it. --
For talking purposes, assume this is true. There is still a risk of communication breakdown, where the speaker and listener don't have a meeting of the minds.
The November post has a number of lines, some of which are obviously disjointed from others. You chose to join the "was a meeting" and "hillary didn't concede" so that "hillary was at the meeting." But that joinder isn't necessarily what the "omniscient" writer had in mind.
In after Mexican Chicken.
Good point. I hadn’t thought of that.
No, I think not. If you apply the Q method, learned through the intuition one derives from reading many of his posts, you will see that it is what Q had in mind.
The Q method I’m referring to is the following: answers to key questions are implicit in secondary questions immediately following the first.
When does a bird sing? Where’s Bilbo Baggins when you need him?
We’re talking about someone close to Hillary I am guessing. So a bird sings when they are guilty as hell and you have the evidence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.