Q post #153 explains why a billionaire would leave a life of comfort behind to lead the battle through the sordid swamp despite continuous threats to his life.
The top of the graphic is an excerpt from that post.
The bottom text is an excerpt is someone putting together the fact that Democrats have documented comments about their “insurance policy” (The Dossier-Russigate) and the night of Hillary’s concession speech, she was nowhere to be found. Q’s drops include a reference to a secret meeting of 9 people in a location distant from the election hall (i.e., she couldn’t give her concession speech because she flew to an emergency meeting re how to remove Trump).
I’ll believe drunk and hysterical before cogent and part of a secret meeting.
-- Q's drops include a reference to a secret meeting of 9 people in a location distant from the election hall (i.e., she couldn't give her concession speech because she flew to an emergency meeting re how to remove Trump). --
The Q post asked why did seven people meet hours after the election. Stop.
It separately asked why Clinton didn't concede. Stop.
I'll give you that anybody could ask those questions, at any time, and there are plenty of inferences that can be taken. But it's a cheap shot on your part to draw a fairly wild inference, then shoot down that straw man as validating your belief or contention.
I'm not asserting that the Q post from December validates him as an insider - although if there was a seven person meeting of that nature at that time it lends some credence to that - my point is that your invalidation argument is weak.
Please try to forget you ever read post #9 on this thread. It is comprised of errors. Here is what I should have written.
Q post #153 explains why a billionaire would leave a life of comfort behind to lead the battle through the sordid swamp despite continuous threats to his life.
The top of the graphic is an excerpt from that post (#153).
The bottom text is an excerpt is someone putting together the fact that Democrats have documented comments about their “insurance policy” (to remove Trump from office in the nearly impossible event that he win) and the night of Hillary’s concession speech, she was nowhere to be found. Q’s drops include a reference to a secret meeting of 9 people in a location distant from the election hall (i.e., she couldn’t give her concession speech because she flew to an emergency meeting with other conspirators to remove Trump from office).
Thanks for posting that, after reading the post claiming Q was behind the news cycle, I knew I had read something much earlier than the one he showed in tonights drop, I went looking for it and could not find anything but I gave up just past 100, I thought it was very early.