Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Oatka

Actually, the studies done in the 70s for the resupply of Europe said the most cost effective approach was to buy more targets. Attack submarines were the best defense, but it was still more cost effective to buy more transports. As you can imagine, this report was not widely distributed, and its author never made Admiral.


19 posted on 01/19/2018 9:36:29 AM PST by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: SubMareener

Ah yes, the old nuclear war by attrition strategy.


21 posted on 01/19/2018 9:40:48 AM PST by Cvengr ( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: SubMareener
[Drain the Atlantic}

Actually, the studies done in the 70s for the resupply of Europe said the most cost effective approach was to buy more targets

The policy during WWII was to build ships faster than the Germans could sink 'em. "Freedom's Forge" said that pre-war, ship building took months to build a freighter. We started launching new Liberty and Victory ships in weeks. Then we sharpened our anti-sub skills and things got better by mid-1943.

22 posted on 01/19/2018 9:52:27 AM PST by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson