Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Norway becomes first country to switch off FM radio
www.thelocal.no ^ | 13 December 2017 | AFP

Posted on 12/14/2017 9:27:02 AM PST by Red Badger

Norway on Wednesday completed its transition to digital radio, becoming the first country in the world to shut down national broadcasts of its FM radio network despite some grumblings.

As scheduled, the country's most northern regions and the Svalbard archipelago in the Arctic switched to Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) in the late morning, said Digitalradio Norge (DRN) which groups Norway's public and commercial radio.

The transition, which began on January 11th, allows for better sound quality, a greater number of channels and more functions, all at a cost eight times lower than FM radio, according to authorities.

The move has however been met with some criticism linked to technical incidents and claims that there is not sufficient DAB coverage across the country.

In addition, radio users have complained about the cost of having to buy new receivers or adapters, usually priced around 100 to 200 euros.

Currently, fewer than half of motorists (49 percent) are able to listen to DAB in their cars, according to DRN figures.

According to a study cited by local media, the share of Norwegians who listen to the radio on a daily basis has dropped by 10 percent in one year, and public broadcaster NRK has lost 21 percent of its audience.

"It's a big change and we have to give listeners time to adapt to digital radio," the head of DRN, Ole Jørgen Torvmark, said in a statement.

"After each shutdown (in a region), we noticed that the audience first dropped but then rose again," he added.

The transition concerns only national radio channels. Most local stations continue to broadcast in FM.

Other countries like Switzerland, Britain and Denmark are due to follow suit in the coming years.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Local News; Music/Entertainment; Society
KEYWORDS: europe; fm; norway; radio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Hmm............
1 posted on 12/14/2017 9:27:02 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Digital signals also have a much shorter range. When the signal gets too weak or there is a lot interference then it won’t work at all.


2 posted on 12/14/2017 9:33:57 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’m on a Norway, radio!


3 posted on 12/14/2017 9:34:20 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (10% pure, flat income tax for everyone. No deductions, credits, or loopholes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

This is only for their government radio stations, not commercial ones......................Like our NPR..............


4 posted on 12/14/2017 9:35:51 AM PST by Red Badger (Road Rage lasts 5 minutes. Road Rash lasts 5 months!.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’m trying to think this out in USA terms.

It’d be like NPR leaving the FM band and going to a digital format that no one has. Meanwhile normal FM stations continue as usual.

Now that is a good idea. I could get behind an idea like this.


5 posted on 12/14/2017 9:39:09 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Bound to happen at some point.

The thing is. with analog AM and FM, or old NTSB analog video for that matter, the transmitting and receiving equipment is relatively simple, and easy to make and use.

Digital equipment is complicated, requires specialized components and software, is not easily replicated, is not electrically robust, and puts users at the mercy of equipment manufacturers.

This is one of the reasons that I don’t like the idea of digital FM ham radio bands. It works out great for the manufacturers and the FCC. Not so much for the DIY radio builders who may not have access to that technology.

That, and digital comms are much easier for government entities to monitor and mine data from.


6 posted on 12/14/2017 9:39:48 AM PST by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it. MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Wish I was in Lillehammer, eating barbequed iguaner.

or Reinsdyrsteik, but it doesn’t rhyme so well.


7 posted on 12/14/2017 9:43:48 AM PST by SpinnerWebb (Winter is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Revel

I believe that local FM is still alive there. It’s only the national broadcast stuff. And, if their gubmit radio is anything like NPR, who’d waste money on getting digital to listen to some undereducated idiots spout the gubmit line?


8 posted on 12/14/2017 9:48:19 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Hmmm, FM - “No static at all....”


9 posted on 12/14/2017 9:50:51 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel
The error correction coding in the signal keeps it sounding near perfect when you would start to notice some noise and fading in an analog signal. But weaken the signal a little beyond that and it becomes impossible to decode at the point analog would sound like crap and be marginally understandable. The range isn't inherently shorter, just the difference between great and unusable has a shorter cutoff. All broadcast radio signals are analog - it's just whether the modulation is AM, FM or digital.

If the range is shorter it is likely because the broadcaster is using less power and relying on error correction to make the signal usable at the edge of his broadcast area and no farther.

10 posted on 12/14/2017 9:52:37 AM PST by KarlInOhio (The Whig Party died when it fled the great fight of its century. Ditto for the Republicans now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Voluntarily cutting yourself off from 90% of your potential audience? Sounds like a helluva business plan.


11 posted on 12/14/2017 9:56:26 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Note that only public radio has switched over. They have no clue about business and profitability, they exist off of government subsidy. Losing 90% of their propaganda audience is a good thing.


12 posted on 12/14/2017 9:59:51 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

The girls don’t seem to care tonight.......


13 posted on 12/14/2017 10:00:20 AM PST by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Have you ever seen a digital signal skipped 350 miles at night. With AM it can be even more. But I received an FM radio station from about 350 miles away(as the crow flies) one night. And it was listenable. I couldn’t even believe it myself.

Maybe not a big deal for music. But I can think of some situations where it might matter in the news department.


14 posted on 12/14/2017 10:08:03 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Revel
With AM it can be even more.
I was stationed at Camp Lejeune in the late '60s and many nights when I had Duty NCO I'd pull in a local Rochester AM station (50K watts) clear as a bell - about 700 miles.
15 posted on 12/14/2017 10:24:13 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

Yeah...Am is just like shortwave at a lower frequency.


16 posted on 12/14/2017 10:39:58 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68

As long as the mood is right.


17 posted on 12/14/2017 10:43:37 AM PST by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

It’s so the Russian bombers can’t hone in on the radio signals.


18 posted on 12/14/2017 10:48:47 AM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

No static at all.


19 posted on 12/14/2017 10:50:19 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73

Gotta put on some Steely Dan to some reason...


20 posted on 12/14/2017 10:57:55 AM PST by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson